Suppr超能文献

[我们能从脑叶切断术时期学到什么?]

[What can we learn from the lobotomy period?].

作者信息

Waal H, Kringlen E, Ersland S, Thaulow J F

机构信息

Psykiatrisk institutt, Oslo.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Jun 30;113(17):2121-5.

PMID:8337674
Abstract

In 1991 the Ministry of Health and Social Affairs appointed a Commission of Inquiry, precipitated by a heated public debate on lobotomy. A group of four psychiatrists studied the case records of 300 patients lobotomized at Gaustad Hospital. The main review by the medical group focused on the high mortality rate during the 1940s. Also, surgery was done on broader indications than officially recommended, and the information given to the next of kin was often questionable. Since the obligation of the psychiatric profession also involves involuntary treatment, particular caution should be exercised in administering new methods. It is important to ensure control and critique by society. Ethical considerations should be integrated into quality control.

摘要

1991年,卫生和社会事务部任命了一个调查委员会,这是由一场关于脑叶切除术的激烈公众辩论引发的。一组四名精神科医生研究了在高斯塔德医院接受脑叶切除术的300名患者的病例记录。医疗小组的主要审查集中在20世纪40年代的高死亡率上。此外,手术的适应症比官方建议的更广泛,而且告知近亲的信息往往存在问题。由于精神科专业的职责还包括非自愿治疗,在采用新方法时应格外谨慎。确保社会进行控制和批评很重要。伦理考量应纳入质量控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验