Gelfand S A, Silman S
Department of Communication Arts and Sciences, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing 11367.
Br J Audiol. 1993 Feb;27(1):29-34. doi: 10.3109/03005369309077886.
This study expanded upon previous work (Gelfand & Silman, 1985) on the relationship between functional components (the difference between the nonorganic and resolved thresholds) and the underlying organic hearing levels. The nature of nonorganic hearing loss (NOHL) was studied with respect to hearing sensitivity after resolution of the nonorganic components in 25 patients with unilateral NOHLs. Most of the subjects had an organic hearing loss underlying the functional components. The configuration of the functional components as a function of frequency was related to that of the resolved hearing levels in a manner similar to that reported for bilateral NOHLs. The strategy employed to exaggerate the loss in the ear with the nonorganic overlay appeared to be unrelated to the nature of the loss in the opposite ear, but the perception of an interaural difference might in some way bias the patient to 'choose' a unilateral NOHL as opposed to a bilateral one. The findings confirm and expand upon the prior ones, suggesting the use of an internalized loudness-based anchor by patients with NOHLs. Thus, the pure tone configuration of NOHL is consistently accounted for on the basis of known and explainable auditory factors regardless of whether the hearing levels are exaggerated in one or both ears.
本研究扩展了之前的工作(Gelfand & Silman,1985年),探讨了功能成分(非器质性阈值与恢复阈值之间的差异)与潜在的器质性听力水平之间的关系。对25例单侧非器质性听力损失患者在非器质性成分恢复后的听力敏感度进行了研究,以探讨非器质性听力损失(NOHL)的性质。大多数受试者在功能成分之下存在器质性听力损失。功能成分随频率的变化情况与恢复后的听力水平的变化情况相关,其方式与双侧NOHL的报道相似。用于夸大存在非器质性叠加的耳朵中听力损失的策略似乎与对侧耳朵中听力损失的性质无关,但双耳差异的感知可能会以某种方式使患者倾向于“选择”单侧NOHL而非双侧NOHL。这些发现证实并扩展了先前的研究结果,表明NOHL患者使用了基于内化响度的锚定。因此,无论听力水平在一只耳朵还是两只耳朵中被夸大,NOHL的纯音形态都可以基于已知且可解释的听觉因素得到一致的解释。