Suppr超能文献

急诊与重症护理人员对使用床旁超声确认膈上中心静脉导管置入的看法。

Emergency and critical care providers' perception about the use of bedside ultrasound for confirmation of above-diaphragm central venous catheter placement.

作者信息

Tran Quincy K, Foster Mark, Bowler Justin, Lancaster Mia, Tchai Jennifer, Andersen Katie, Matta Ann, Haase Daniel J

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

University of Maryland School of Medicine, The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2020 Jan 7;6(1):e03113. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03113. eCollection 2020 Jan.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chest radiography (CXR) is commonly used to confirm the proper placement of above-diaphragm central venous catheters (CVCs) and to detect associated complications. Recent studies have shown that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has better sensitivity and is faster than CXR for these purposes. We were interested in documenting how often emergency medicine and critical care practitioners perform POCUS to confirm proper CVC positioning as well as their confidence in performing it.

METHODS

We surveyed members of our state's chapters of the College of Emergency Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine between April and December 2018. Our primary outcome was the percentage of providers who would agree to perform only POCUS, forgoing CXR, for confirmation of CVC position. We performed multivariable logistic regressions to measure associations between demographic, clinical information, and outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-six providers participated (a 25% participation rate). Their specialties were as follows: emergency medicine, 75%; critical care, 13%; and emergency medicine/critical care, 11%. Thirty-one percent would use POCUS only for CVC confirmation, while 42% were confident in performing POCUS for this purpose. Multivariable logistic regressions showed that performing more non-procedural ultrasound examinations was associated with a higher likelihood of agreeing to perform POCUS only (OR, 2.9; 95% CI: 1.3-6.3). Forty-six percent of relevant comments suggested more training to increase the use of POCUS.

CONCLUSION

Participants in this study did not frequently use POCUS for CVC confirmation. Designers of training curricula should consider including more instruction in the use of POCUS to confirm proper CVC placement and to detect complications.

摘要

引言

胸部X线摄影(CXR)常用于确认膈上中心静脉导管(CVC)的正确放置并检测相关并发症。最近的研究表明,即时超声检查(POCUS)在这些方面具有更高的灵敏度,且比CXR更快。我们感兴趣的是记录急诊医学和重症医学从业者使用POCUS确认CVC正确定位的频率以及他们对进行该项检查的信心。

方法

我们在2018年4月至12月期间对本州急诊医师学会和重症医学会分会的成员进行了调查。我们的主要结果是同意仅使用POCUS而不进行CXR来确认CVC位置的提供者的百分比。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以衡量人口统计学、临床信息与结果之间的关联。

结果

136名提供者参与了调查(参与率为25%)。他们的专业领域如下:急诊医学,75%;重症医学,13%;急诊医学/重症医学,11%。31%的人仅会使用POCUS进行CVC确认,而42%的人对使用POCUS进行此项检查有信心。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,进行更多非程序性超声检查与仅同意进行POCUS的可能性更高相关(比值比,2.9;95%置信区间:1.3 - 6.3)。46%的相关评论建议进行更多培训以增加POCUS的使用。

结论

本研究的参与者并不经常使用POCUS进行CVC确认。培训课程的设计者应考虑增加更多关于使用POCUS确认CVC正确放置和检测并发症的指导。

相似文献

8

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
A review in emergency central venous catheterization.急诊中心静脉置管综述。
Chin J Traumatol. 2017 Jun;20(3):137-140. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 May 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验