Suppr超能文献

胰腺和肝外胆管肿块的术中细针穿刺抽吸

Intraoperative fine needle aspiration of pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary masses.

作者信息

Earnhardt R C, McQuone S J, Minasi J S, Feldman P S, Jones R S, Hanks J B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908.

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Aug;177(2):147-52.

PMID:8342094
Abstract

Intraoperative fine needle aspiration (IFNA) of masses of the pancreas and extrahepatic biliary system provides a method of rapid tissue diagnosis with a much lower complication rate than either wedge or large bore needle biopsies. Few series include IFNA of extrahepatic biliary system masses in their analyses. We retrospectively evaluated all IFNA of pancreatic, extrahepatic biliary and ampullary masses at the University of Virginia from March 1981 to December 1991 to assess the diagnostic accuracy of this procedure. Ninety-nine IFNA were performed--75 of the pancreas, 17 of the extrahepatic biliary system and seven of the ampulla. All aspirations were performed with direct visualization or palpation of the tumor, or both, using several passes with a 22 gauge needle. A diagnostic "positive" or "negative" reading was rendered in 90 of 99 IFNA. Carcinoma was confirmed by positive tissue diagnosis or clinical course consistent with cancer. Benign disease was confirmed by negative pathologic factors from a resected specimen or confirmatory clinical course of at least 18 months. Diagnosis was confirmed by these criteria in 82 patients. Thirty-four of 43 patients with confirmed carcinoma of the pancreas had positive cytologic factors by IFNA. Three pancreas IFNA were deemed as "suspicious" and six as "unsatisfactory." Two patients with "suspicious" findings had pathologically confirmed well-differentiated carcinoma. Carcinoma of the ampulla and extrahepatic biliary tract was detected by IFNA in 17 of 18 confirmed patients. The overall sensitivity of positive or negative IFNA in this series in 90 percent, with 100 percent specificity and 92 percent accuracy. IFNA has a positive predictive value of 100 percent and negative predictive value of 74 percent. We conclude that IFNA is a highly accurate diagnostic procedure and represents the preferred technique of obtaining an intraoperative tissue diagnosis in masses of the pancreas, extrahepatic biliary tract and ampulla. Positive IFNA may definitively guide surgical decision-making; however, we caution that negative IFNA cannot be relied on definitively to exclude the diagnosis of carcinoma.

摘要

对胰腺和肝外胆道系统肿块进行术中细针穿刺抽吸(IFNA)可提供一种快速组织诊断方法,其并发症发生率远低于楔形或粗针活检。很少有系列研究在分析中纳入肝外胆道系统肿块的IFNA。我们回顾性评估了1981年3月至1991年12月在弗吉尼亚大学进行的所有胰腺、肝外胆道和壶腹肿块的IFNA,以评估该操作的诊断准确性。共进行了99次IFNA,其中胰腺75次,肝外胆道系统17次,壶腹7次。所有抽吸均在直视或触诊肿瘤(或两者同时进行)的情况下,使用22号针穿刺数次完成。99次IFNA中有90次给出了诊断性“阳性”或“阴性”结果。通过阳性组织诊断或与癌症相符的临床病程确诊为癌。通过切除标本的阴性病理因素或至少18个月的确诊临床病程确诊为良性疾病。根据这些标准,82例患者的诊断得到证实。43例确诊为胰腺癌的患者中,34例通过IFNA有阳性细胞学因素。3次胰腺IFNA被判定为“可疑”,6次为“不满意”。2例有“可疑”结果的患者经病理证实为高分化癌。18例确诊患者中有17例通过IFNA检测出壶腹和肝外胆道癌。本系列中IFNA阳性或阴性的总体敏感性为90%,特异性为100%,准确性为92%。IFNA的阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为74%。我们得出结论,IFNA是一种高度准确的诊断方法,是获取胰腺、肝外胆道和壶腹肿块术中组织诊断的首选技术。IFNA阳性可能明确指导手术决策;然而,我们提醒,不能完全依赖IFNA阴性来排除癌症诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验