Tran C C, Latham R D, Self D A, Fanton J W, White C D, Owens R W
Laboratory for Aerospace Cardiovascular Research, Armstrong Laboratory, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas 78235-5301.
Am J Physiol. 1993 Jul;265(1 Pt 2):H244-51. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1993.265.1.H244.
Studies of the hydraulic loading conditions on the heart in humans, especially pulsatile load, have primarily been limited to the supine state. Therefore, we have chosen a nonhuman primate model, the baboon, to assess left ventricular/vascular coupling in both supine and upright positions. Primate subjects were studied by catheterization under sedation and then after surgical implantation of transducers. This allowed the evaluation of postural stress in the chronically instrumented conscious baboon and then after light dissociative doses of ketamine. Basic hemodynamic variables were evaluated for baboons in supine and upright positions. Fourier analysis was applied to aortic pressure and flow to obtain input and characteristic impedance and the ratio of pulsatile (Wp) to total (Wt) left ventricular power (Wp/Wt). The aortic reflected, or backward, pressure was also calculated. Peripheral resistance increased (P = 0.01) and reflected pressure decreased (17.74 +/- 1.50 vs. 15.21 +/- 2 mmHg; P < 0.01) in upright subjects. Characteristic impedance and Wp/Wt were unchanged. Postoperatively, peripheral resistance increased (2,651 +/- 311 vs. 3,667 +/- 276; P < 0.05) and mean power and Wt decreased (P < 0.01) without changes in reflected pressure. All variables were unchanged after light dissociative doses of ketamine. Thus there is no significant change in efficiency of left ventricular/vascular coupling formulated in terms of Wp/Wt or input impedance with postural stress.
对人体心脏水力负荷状况的研究,尤其是搏动性负荷,主要局限于仰卧状态。因此,我们选择了一种非人类灵长类动物模型——狒狒,来评估仰卧位和直立位时的左心室/血管耦合情况。通过在镇静状态下进行导管插入术,然后在手术植入传感器后对灵长类动物受试者进行研究。这使得我们能够在长期植入仪器的清醒狒狒身上,以及在给予小剂量解离性氯胺酮后评估体位应激情况。对仰卧位和直立位的狒狒评估了基本血流动力学变量。应用傅里叶分析对主动脉压力和流量进行分析,以获得输入阻抗和特征阻抗,以及搏动性(Wp)与总左心室功率(Wt)的比值(Wp/Wt)。还计算了主动脉反射压或反向压力。直立位受试者的外周阻力增加(P = 0.01),反射压降低(17.74±1.50 vs. 15.21±2 mmHg;P < 0.01)。特征阻抗和Wp/Wt未发生变化。术后,外周阻力增加(2651±311 vs. 3667±276;P < 0.05),平均功率和Wt降低(P < 0.01),而反射压无变化。给予小剂量解离性氯胺酮后,所有变量均未发生变化。因此,以Wp/Wt或输入阻抗表示的左心室/血管耦合效率在体位应激时无显著变化。