Van Willigen J D, Morimoto T, Broekhuijsen M L, Bijl G K, Inoue T
Department of Neurobiology and Oral Physiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Arch Oral Biol. 1993 Jun;38(6):497-505. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(93)90186-p.
Whether in the oral system the digastric muscles (which lack muscle spindles) are under the control of proprioceptive information from the masseter muscles (which contain muscle spindles) was investigated by analysing whether and how the masseters and digastrics showed coordinated behaviour during a static, forceful bite. Subjects were asked to maintain a 100-N force for 15 s with and without visual guidance; bite force exerted, and masseter and digastric electromyograms (EMGs) were recorded. Under visual guidance all subjects co-contracted their digastric muscles during the isometric bite. They held the force for a short time, followed by periods with fluctuations (peak-to-peak force amplitude about 15-20 N). Fluctuations in bite force correlated with the masseter EMGs, the maximum in the correlogram occurring at about -50 ms with the force lagging the masseter. In 75% of the subjects a significant periodic component in the masseter and in the force spectra was found at about 4 Hz. This was also seen in the amplitude spectra of the forces, which showed in 80% of the subjects a significant elevation between 7-10 Hz as well. No correlation between the digastric EMGs and the bite forces, and between the EMGs of masseter and digastric could be detected. Spectra of digastric EMGs showed no prominent maxima. When subjects were deprived of visual feedback, maxima at -50 ms in the cross-correlation functions of the masseters and the forces were reduced considerably; periodicities of +/- 250 ms disappeared.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
