• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of preventive home visits to elderly people.对老年人进行预防性家访的效果。
BMJ. 1993 Jul 3;307(6895):27-32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6895.27.
2
Effects of home visits by home nurses to elderly people with health problems: design of a randomised clinical trial in the Netherlands [ISRCTN92017183].家庭护士对有健康问题的老年人进行家访的效果:荷兰一项随机临床试验的设计[ISRCTN92017183]
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec 15;4(1):35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-35.
3
In-home preventive comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) reduces mortality--a randomized controlled trial.居家预防性综合老年评估(CGA)可降低死亡率——一项随机对照试验。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Nov-Dec;55(3):639-44. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.06.012. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
4
Effects on health care use and associated cost of a home visiting program for older people with poor health status: a randomized clinical trial in the Netherlands.健康状况不佳的老年人家庭访视项目对医疗保健利用及相关费用的影响:荷兰的一项随机临床试验
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Mar;63(3):291-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.3.291.
5
A trial of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments for elderly people living in the community.一项针对社区老年居民的年度居家综合老年评估试验。
N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov 2;333(18):1184-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199511023331805.
6
An in-home preventive assessment program for independent older adults: a randomized controlled trial.一项针对独立生活的老年人的居家预防性评估项目:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Jun;42(6):630-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06862.x.
7
A randomized trial of in-home visits for disability prevention in community-dwelling older people at low and high risk for nursing home admission.针对入住养老院低风险和高风险的社区居家老年人进行残疾预防家庭访视的随机试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Apr 10;160(7):977-86. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.7.977.
8
Home visits to prevent nursing home admission and functional decline in elderly people: systematic review and meta-regression analysis.家访预防老年人入住养老院及功能衰退:系统评价与Meta回归分析
JAMA. 2002 Feb 27;287(8):1022-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.8.1022.
9
Effects of preventive home visits on health-related quality-of-life and mortality in home-dwelling older adults.预防性家访对居家老年人健康相关生活质量和死亡率的影响。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Mar;37(1):90-97. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1569372. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Preventive home visits to elderly people by community nurses in The Netherlands.荷兰社区护士对老年人的预防性家访。
J Adv Nurs. 1991 Jun;16(6):631-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb01720.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施,针对体弱老年人维持其独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514.
2
Interventions for loneliness in older adults: a systematic review of reviews.老年人孤独干预措施的系统评价综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 18;12:1427605. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1427605. eCollection 2024.
3
The effectiveness of preventive home visits on resilience and health-related outcomes among community dwelling older adults: A systematic review.预防性家庭访视对社区居住的老年人的适应能力和健康相关结局的有效性:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 1;19(7):e0306188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306188. eCollection 2024.
4
Evidence-based interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care: A systematic review.社区护理中基于证据的干预措施与护士敏感结局:一项系统评价
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Nov 23;3:100053. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100053. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Community based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people: systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施以维持老年人的独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2024 Mar 21;384:e077764. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077764.
6
Interventions to Reduce Loneliness in Community-Living Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.干预措施对减少社区居住的老年人孤独感的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 May;39(6):1015-1028. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08517-5. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
7
Social Prescription Interventions Addressing Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Meta-Review Integrating On-the-Ground Resources.社会处方干预措施解决老年人的社会隔离和孤独问题:整合实地资源的元综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 17;25:e40213. doi: 10.2196/40213.
8
Interventions against Social Isolation of Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Existing Literature and Interventions.针对老年人社会隔离的干预措施:现有文献及干预措施的系统综述
Geriatrics (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;6(3):82. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6030082.
9
Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness during COVID-19 physical distancing measures: A rapid systematic review.在 COVID-19 期间实施物理隔离措施以减少社会隔离和孤独感的干预措施:快速系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0247139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247139. eCollection 2021.
10
External validation of the detection of indicators and vulnerabilities for emergency room trips (DIVERT) scale: a retrospective cohort study.外部验证急诊就诊指标和脆弱性(DIVERT)量表:回顾性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 20;20(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01816-0.

本文引用的文献

1
A SELF-RATING DEPRESSION SCALE.一份自评抑郁量表。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965 Jan;12:63-70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008.
2
Consequences of assessment and intervention among elderly people: a three year randomised controlled trial.老年人评估与干预的后果:一项为期三年的随机对照试验。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Dec 1;289(6457):1522-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6457.1522.
3
Effect of health visitors working with elderly patients in general practice: a randomised controlled trial.健康访视员在全科医疗中为老年患者服务的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Feb 4;288(6414):369-72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6414.369.
4
Evaluation of a ten-question mental test in the institutionalized elderly.针对机构养老老年人的十项心理测试评估
Age Ageing. 1974 Aug;3(3):152-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/3.3.152.
5
[Preventive medical examination in the aged; pros and cons].[老年人的预防性医学检查;利弊]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1986 Oct;17(5):205-8.
6
New year message.新年致辞。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Jan 2;296(6614):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6614.1.
7
Screening elderly people in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.基层医疗中对老年人的筛查:一项随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Mar;40(332):94-7.
8
Design of a Dutch study to test preventive home visits to the elderly.一项荷兰研究的设计,旨在测试对老年人的预防性家访。
Nurs Res. 1991 May-Jun;40(3):185-8.
9
Why do elderly people seek professional home care? Methodologies compared.老年人为何寻求专业居家护理?方法比较
J Community Health. 1992 Jun;17(3):131-41. doi: 10.1007/BF01324402.
10
Health checks on patients 75 years and over in Nottinghamshire after the new GP contract.新的全科医生合同实施后,对诺丁汉郡75岁及以上患者进行的健康检查。
BMJ. 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):619-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6854.619.

对老年人进行预防性家访的效果。

Effects of preventive home visits to elderly people.

作者信息

van Rossum E, Frederiks C M, Philipsen H, Portengen K, Wiskerke J, Knipschild P

机构信息

University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ. 1993 Jul 3;307(6895):27-32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6895.27.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.307.6895.27
PMID:8343668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1678489/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of preventive home visits by public health nurses on the state of health of and use of services by elderly people living at home.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

General population of elderly people in one of the southern regions of the Netherlands.

SUBJECTS

580 subjects aged between 75 and 84 years randomly allocated to intervention (292) or control (288) group.

INTERVENTIONS

Four visits a year over three years in intervention group. Control group received no home visits.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Self rated health, functional state, well being, loneliness, aspects of the mental state (depressive complaints, memory disturbances), and mortality. Use of services and costs.

RESULTS

Visits had no effect on the health of the subjects. In the group visited no higher scores were seen on health related measures, fewer died (42 (14%) v 50 (17%)), and community care increased slightly. In the control group more were referred to outpatient clinics (166 (66%) v 132 (55%)), and they had a 40% increased risk of admission (incidence rate ratio 1.4; 90% confidence interval 1.2 to 1.6). No differences were found in long term institutional care, and overall expenditure per person in the intervention group exceeded that in the control group by 4%. Additional analyses showed that visits were effective for subjects who initially rated their health as poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Preventive home visits are not beneficial for the general population of elderly people living at home but might be effective when restricted to subjects with poor health.

摘要

目的

评估公共卫生护士进行预防性家访对居家老年人健康状况和服务利用情况的影响。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

荷兰南部某地区的老年人群体。

研究对象

580名年龄在75至84岁之间的受试者,随机分为干预组(292人)或对照组(288人)。

干预措施

干预组在三年中每年进行四次家访。对照组未接受家访。

主要观察指标

自评健康状况、功能状态、幸福感、孤独感、精神状态方面(抑郁症状、记忆障碍)以及死亡率。服务利用情况和费用。

结果

家访对受试者的健康没有影响。在家访组中,与健康相关的指标得分没有更高,死亡人数较少(42人(14%)对50人(17%)),社区护理略有增加。在对照组中,更多人被转诊到门诊诊所(166人(66%)对132人(55%)),他们入院的风险增加了40%(发病率比1.4;90%置信区间1.2至1.6)。在长期机构护理方面未发现差异,干预组人均总支出比对照组高出4%。进一步分析表明,家访对最初自评健康状况较差的受试者有效。

结论

预防性家访对居家老年人总体人群没有益处,但仅限于健康状况较差的受试者时可能有效。