Danuser H, Ackermann D K, Marth D C, Studer U E, Zingg E J
Department of Urology, University of Berne, Switzerland.
J Urol. 1993 Sep;150(3):824-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35623-9.
A total of 110 patients with upper ureteral calculi was admitted to a prospective trial and randomly allocated to 2 groups: 1 group treated with in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and 1 group treated with ureteral manipulation before ESWL. All patients had solitary upper ureteral calculi without urinary infection. The stones had to be smaller than 1 cm. and located more than 2 cm. lateral to the spine. ESWL was performed with the Dornier HM3 lithotriptor. One patient in the in situ ESWL group had to be treated twice because disintegration of the stone was insufficient after the initial treatment session. All other patients underwent only 1 treatment session. Because 16 patients were lost to followup, 94 were evaluable for the analysis of immediate and long-term results. For disintegration of the stones in situ ESWL needed significantly more shock waves (1,844 +/- 639 versus 1,297 +/- 473, p < 0.001) and a higher voltage (19.5 +/- 1.4 versus 18.7 +/- 0.9 kv., p < 0.001). There were no severe complications in either treatment group. At 3 months 44 of 46 patients (96%) after in situ ESWL and 45 of 48 (94%) after ureteral manipulation before ESWL were free of stones. In view of these results it is suggested that uncomplicated upper ureteral calculi (as defined previously) should be treated first with in situ ESWL, thus, avoiding an invasive procedure.
共有110例上输尿管结石患者纳入一项前瞻性试验,并随机分为2组:1组采用原位体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗,1组在ESWL前进行输尿管操作治疗。所有患者均为孤立性上输尿管结石且无尿路感染。结石必须小于1 cm,且位于脊柱外侧超过2 cm处。使用多尼尔HM3碎石机进行ESWL。原位ESWL组中有1例患者因初次治疗后结石破碎不充分而需接受两次治疗。所有其他患者仅接受1次治疗。由于16例患者失访,94例患者可用于分析近期和远期结果。原位ESWL碎石所需的冲击波显著更多(1844±639次对1297±473次,p<0.001),且电压更高(19.5±1.4 kV对18.7±0.9 kV,p<0.001)。两个治疗组均未出现严重并发症。3个月时,原位ESWL治疗后46例患者中有44例(96%)无结石,ESWL前输尿管操作治疗后48例患者中有45例(94%)无结石。鉴于这些结果,建议对于无并发症的上输尿管结石(如先前定义)应首先采用原位ESWL治疗,从而避免侵入性操作。