• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of hydronephrosis on treatment outcome of solitary proximal ureteral stone after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.肾积水对体外冲击波碎石术后孤立性近端输尿管结石治疗效果的影响。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Oct;24(10):507-13. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70009-9.
2
Impact of the degree of hydronephrosis on the efficacy of in situ extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi.肾积水程度对原位体外冲击波碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石疗效的影响
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007;41(3):208-13. doi: 10.1080/00365590601068892.
3
Prospective study on ultrasonography plus plain radiography in predicting residual obstruction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones.超声检查联合X线平片预测输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术后残余梗阻的前瞻性研究
Urology. 2002 Mar;59(3):340-3. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01584-9.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: Does the presence and degree of hydronephrosis affect success?体外冲击波碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石:肾积水的存在及程度是否会影响治疗成功率?
Eur Urol. 2006 Feb;49(2):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.022. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
5
Efficacy of expulsive therapy using nifedipine or tamsulosin, both associated with ketoprofene, after shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones.硝苯地平或坦索罗辛联合酮洛芬用于输尿管结石冲击波碎石术后促排石治疗的疗效
Urol Res. 2007 Jun;35(3):133-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-007-0085-5. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
6
Does degree of hydronephrosis affect success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones?肾积水程度会影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的成功率吗?
Urology. 2007 Mar;69(3):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.010.
7
Factors influencing the failure of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with Piezolith 3000 in the management of solitary ureteral stone.影响使用Piezolith 3000型体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立性输尿管结石失败的因素。
Urolithiasis. 2014 Jun;42(3):263-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0641-8. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
8
Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi in colic versus noncolic patients.急性与非急性患者近端输尿管结石的快速体外冲击波碎石术
Eur Urol. 2007 Oct;52(4):1223-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
9
Factors influencing the efficacy of ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a retrospective study.影响超声引导体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石疗效的因素:一项回顾性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Dec 20;52(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01512-9.
10
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy for stones in lower ureter.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管下段结石的单一疗法。
Urology. 1992 Aug;40(2):132-6. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(92)90511-t.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Early Intervention in Acute Ureteral Colic.急性输尿管绞痛早期干预的临床及影像学预测因素
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jul 30;14:4051-4059. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S322170. eCollection 2021.
2
Age-related delay in urinary stone clearance in elderly patients with solitary proximal ureteral calculi treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术治疗老年孤立性近端输尿管结石患者时与年龄相关的尿石清除延迟
Urolithiasis. 2015 Oct;43(5):419-26. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0783-3. Epub 2015 May 16.
3
Factors influencing the failure of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with Piezolith 3000 in the management of solitary ureteral stone.影响使用Piezolith 3000型体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立性输尿管结石失败的因素。
Urolithiasis. 2014 Jun;42(3):263-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0641-8. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
4
Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Comparative Clinical Trial Between Transureteral Lithotripsy (TUL) and Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL).大型近端输尿管结石的治疗:经输尿管碎石术(TUL)与冲击波碎石术(SWL)的比较临床试验
Nephrourol Mon. 2012 Summer;4(3):556-9. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.3936. Epub 2012 Jun 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Noninvasive management of obstructing ureteral stones using electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.使用电磁体外冲击波碎石术对梗阻性输尿管结石进行无创治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2008 May;22(5):1339-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9766-6. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
2
Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.用于预测体外冲击波碎石术后结石清除率的术前列线图。
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.089.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and the "end of the stone age".
Eur Urol. 2006 Sep;50(3):400-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.013. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: Does the presence and degree of hydronephrosis affect success?体外冲击波碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石:肾积水的存在及程度是否会影响治疗成功率?
Eur Urol. 2006 Feb;49(2):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.022. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
5
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for solitary distal ureteral stones: does the degree of urinary obstruction affect success?体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立性远端输尿管结石:尿路梗阻程度会影响治疗成功率吗?
J Endourol. 2004 Apr;18(3):237-40. doi: 10.1089/089277904773582822.
6
Clinical practice. Acute renal colic from ureteral calculus.临床实践。输尿管结石所致急性肾绞痛。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 12;350(7):684-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp030813.
7
Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter.使用第二代碎石机进行输尿管结石冲击波碎石术失败的独立预测因素。
J Endourol. 2003 May;17(4):201-5. doi: 10.1089/089277903765444302.
8
Hounsfield units on computerized tomography predict stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.计算机断层扫描上的亨氏单位可预测体外冲击波碎石术后的结石清除率。
J Urol. 2003 May;169(5):1679-81. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000055608.92069.3a.
9
Factors associated with failure of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones using Dornier lithotripter U/50.使用多尼尔U/50型体外冲击波碎石机治疗输尿管结石时与碎石失败相关的因素。
Int J Urol. 2002 Jun;9(6):304-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2002.00475.x.
10
Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.非增强螺旋CT显示输尿管结石自然排出与结石大小和位置的关系。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jan;178(1):101-3. doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.1.1780101.

肾积水对体外冲击波碎石术后孤立性近端输尿管结石治疗效果的影响。

Impact of hydronephrosis on treatment outcome of solitary proximal ureteral stone after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

作者信息

Hsiao Hsi-Lin, Huang Shu-Pin, Wu Wen-Jeng, Lee Yung-Chin, Li Wei-Ming, Chou Yii-Her, Chang Ai-Wen, Huang Chun-Hsiung, Sun Shu-Chin, Liu Chia-Chu

机构信息

Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Min-Sheng Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Oct;24(10):507-13. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70009-9.

DOI:10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70009-9
PMID:19181581
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11917655/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of hydronephrosis on the treatment outcome of patients with a solitary proximal ureteral stone after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). A total of 182 consecutive patients who underwent ESWL for a solitary proximal ureteral stone of between 5 and 20 mm in size in our institution were included in this study. The degree of hydronephrosis was defined by renal ultrasonography. Patient data, stone size, shock wave numbers and shock wave energy were also recorded. Treatment outcome was evaluated 3 months after the first session of ESWL. In multivariate analysis, only the maximal stone length (odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.91; p = 0.04) and the degree of hydronephrosis (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16-0.98; p = 0.045) were significant predicting factors for stone-free status 3 months after ESWL. For stones < or = 10 mm, the stone-free rate decreased from 80% in patients with mild hydronephrosis to 56.4% in those with moderate to severe hydronephrosis. For stones > 10 mm, the stone-free rate decreased further, from 65.2% in patients with mild hydronephrosis to 33.3% in those with moderate to severe hydronephrosis. In summary, patients with a solitary proximal ureteral stone and a stone > 10 mm, the treatment outcome after ESWL was not good if moderate to severe hydronephrosis was noted on ultrasonography. Alternative treatments, such as ureteroscopic lithotripsy, may be appropriate as initial treatment or after failure of one session of ESWL.

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨肾积水对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗孤立性近端输尿管结石患者治疗效果的影响。本研究纳入了在我们机构接受ESWL治疗的182例连续患者,这些患者的孤立性近端输尿管结石大小在5至20毫米之间。肾积水程度通过肾脏超声检查确定。还记录了患者数据、结石大小、冲击波次数和冲击波能量。在首次ESWL治疗后3个月评估治疗效果。多因素分析显示,只有最大结石长度(优势比[OR],0.15;95%置信区间[CI],0.03 - 0.91;p = 0.04)和肾积水程度(OR,0.40;95% CI,0.16 - 0.98;p = 0.045)是ESWL治疗后3个月结石清除状态的显著预测因素。对于直径≤10毫米的结石,结石清除率从轻度肾积水患者的80%降至中度至重度肾积水患者的56.4%。对于直径>10毫米的结石,结石清除率进一步下降,从轻度肾积水患者的65.2%降至中度至重度肾积水患者的33.3%。总之,对于孤立性近端输尿管结石且结石>10毫米的患者,如果超声检查发现中度至重度肾积水,ESWL治疗后的效果不佳。替代治疗方法,如输尿管镜碎石术,可能适合作为初始治疗或在ESWL治疗一次失败后使用。