• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残疾老年人的座位及轮式移动设备使用情况

Seating and wheeled mobility in the disabled elderly population.

作者信息

Redford J B

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66103.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Aug;74(8):877-85. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90016-4.

DOI:10.1016/0003-9993(93)90016-4
PMID:8347074
Abstract

Elderly persons constitute the largest among the populations regularly using wheelchairs. This is a review of the few studies specifically concerned with seating for the elderly; it identifies current problems, particularly in the seating for aged people who are in long-term care facilities. This review describes ways of matching currently available seating technology with the needs of disabled elderly persons. Two major barriers to greater use of newer seating technology are (1) the high cost of durable medical equipment and (2) the failure of most clinicians and institutional administrators to recognize the importance of posture and comfort to provide functional independence in wheelchair users. This review discusses seating for four groups of elderly persons: (1) the nonmobile, dependents who may be safety risks and are without energy or ability to wheel or walk by themselves; (2) mobile nonambulatory; and (3) ambulatory, but with special wheelchair needs. Research is needed in wheeled mobility in a number of areas: better matching of mobility to function, cheaper and more effective cushions, more modular seating systems, and better lifting and transfer devices. The American National Standards Institute in cooperation with Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America has recently recommended standards for wheelchair performance that may be legislated in the next few years.

摘要

老年人是经常使用轮椅的人群中数量最多的。这是一篇对少数专门针对老年人座椅研究的综述;它指出了当前存在的问题,特别是在长期护理机构中老年人的座椅方面。这篇综述描述了如何使现有的座椅技术与残疾老年人的需求相匹配。更广泛地使用新型座椅技术存在两个主要障碍:(1)耐用医疗设备成本高昂;(2)大多数临床医生和机构管理人员未能认识到姿势和舒适度对轮椅使用者实现功能独立的重要性。这篇综述讨论了四类老年人的座椅情况:(1)无行动能力、需要照料的人,他们可能存在安全风险,且没有精力或能力自行推动轮椅或行走;(2)可移动但不能行走的人;(3)能行走,但有特殊轮椅需求。在多个领域的轮式移动方面都需要进行研究:使移动性与功能更好地匹配、更便宜且更有效的靠垫、更模块化的座椅系统,以及更好的升降和转移设备。美国国家标准学会与北美康复工程学会合作,最近推荐了轮椅性能标准,这些标准可能在未来几年内立法实施。

相似文献

1
Seating and wheeled mobility in the disabled elderly population.残疾老年人的座位及轮式移动设备使用情况
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Aug;74(8):877-85. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90016-4.
2
Establishing seating and wheeled mobility research priorities.确定座位及轮式移动设备的研究重点。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 May;2(3):169-72. doi: 10.1080/17483100701381715.
3
Reducing pressure with the goal of improving outcomes: a retrospective chart review of cushion evaluations and recommendations at one seating clinic.减压以改善结果为目标:一家座椅诊所的坐垫评估和建议的回顾性图表分析。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 May;19(4):1552-1560. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2212012. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
mobilityRERC state of the science: How science influences public policy in seating and mobility.移动性RERC科学现状:科学如何影响座椅和移动性方面的公共政策。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 Nov;8(6):447-53. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.823575.
5
mobilityRERC state of the science conference: Considerations for developing an evidence base for wheeled mobility and seating service delivery.移动性RERC科学现状会议:为轮式移动和座椅服务提供建立证据基础的考量
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 Nov;8(6):462-71. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.823577. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
6
Functional outcomes associated with adaptive seating interventions in children and youth with wheeled mobility needs.与有轮式移动需求的儿童和青少年适应性座椅干预相关的功能结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 May;95(5):825-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
7
Telerehabilitation wheeled mobility and seating assessments compared with in person.远程康复轮式移动和座椅评估与面对面评估的比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jun;91(6):874-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.017.
8
Changes in residents' seating needs and perception of stakeholders since implementation of a provincial wheelchair program.自省级轮椅项目实施以来居民座位需求及利益相关者认知的变化。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Aug;16(6):668-673. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1695964. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
9
Wheeled mobility (wheelchair) service delivery: scope of the evidence.轮式移动(轮椅)服务提供:证据范围。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan 17;156(2):141-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-2-201201170-00010.
10
End user evaluation of a Kneeling Wheelchair with "on the fly" adjustable seating functions.对具有“即时”可调座椅功能的跪式轮椅的终端用户评估。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Aug;14(6):543-554. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1462861. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an Evaluation System for Transfer Care Skills Using Embroidered Body Pressure and Proximity Sensor.开发一种利用刺绣体压和接近传感器评估转移动作技能的系统。
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2023 Jul 10;11:460-468. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3294062. eCollection 2023.
2
Health, social care and technological interventions to improve functional ability of older adults living at home: An evidence and gap map.改善居家老年人功能能力的健康、社会护理及技术干预措施:一项证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 7;17(3):e1175. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1175. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Evidence-Based Strategies for Preserving Mobility for Elderly and Aging Manual Wheelchair Users.
为老年及老龄手动轮椅使用者保持行动能力的循证策略
Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2015 Jan-Mar;31(1):26-41. doi: 10.1097/TGR.0000000000000042.