Suppr超能文献

Comparative cytologic yield and quality of three Pap smear instruments.

作者信息

Toffler W L, Pluedeman C K, Sinclair A E, Ireland K M, Byrne B J

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.

出版信息

Fam Med. 1993 Jun;25(6):403-7.

PMID:8349063
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various sampling techniques of the cervix have established false negative rates ranging from 18% to 45%. A number of studies suggest that this false negative rate can be reduced by sampling techniques that are associated with higher yields of endocervical cells.

METHOD

This study enrolled 301 women, each of whom had a Pap smear obtained using three different sampling instruments (a cervical brush, a plastic spatula, and a cotton swab) in random order.

RESULTS

The cervical brush yielded a better endocervical sample than either of the other instruments (P < .001), and there was no difference between the swab and spatula. In addition, the recovery of endocervical cells increased with each additional sample taken, regardless of instrument used (P < .001), although the difference in yield between the second and third samples was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

To enhance the yield of endocervical cells in Pap smear sampling, consideration should be given to using the cervical brush routinely as a sampling instrument and to taking more than one sample per screening.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验