• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[传统巴氏涂片的质量。质量评估与改进的动力]

[Quality of conventional PAP smears. Quality assessment and motivation for improvement].

作者信息

Regitnig P, Nader A, Wiener H

机构信息

Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 25, 8036, Graz, Österreich.

出版信息

Pathologe. 2012 Jul;33(4):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s00292-012-1574-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00292-012-1574-z
PMID:22569927
Abstract

The success of cytology in screening programs for cervical cancer is highly dependent on the smear quality. Interdisciplinary projects which evaluate the smear quality and the results of collection devices could be helpful for an improvement and a successful example for quality improvement is presented here. An average of 83% technically adequate and representative smears was documented for 12 million conventional PAP smears; however only an average of 68% technically adequate and representative smears was found for the group of least successful smear takers of all laboratories. This indicates a potential for improvement. Following an interdisciplinary project on smear quality improvement the average rate of representative smears increased from 69 to 83% and in another project this rate remained stable at 86%. Based on 158,411 conventional smears, representative smears were achieved in 92% using Cervex-Brush®, 86% using Szalay Spatula and 82% Cytobrush methods. The combinations of Cytobrush with the Ayre wooden spatula, cotton wool swab or Szalay Spatula achieved 97%, 94% and 92% representative smears, respectively.

摘要

细胞学在宫颈癌筛查项目中的成功高度依赖于涂片质量。评估涂片质量和采集设备结果的跨学科项目可能有助于改进,本文展示了一个质量改进的成功案例。在1200万份传统巴氏涂片中,平均有83%的涂片在技术上是足够的且具有代表性;然而,在所有实验室中涂片采集最不成功的一组中,平均只有68%的涂片在技术上是足够的且具有代表性。这表明存在改进的潜力。在一个关于涂片质量改进的跨学科项目之后,具有代表性涂片的平均比例从69%提高到了83%,在另一个项目中,这一比例稳定在86%。基于158411份传统涂片,使用Cervex-Brush®获得具有代表性涂片的比例为92%,使用Szalay刮勺为86%,使用细胞刷方法为82%。细胞刷与艾尔木制刮勺、棉拭子或Szalay刮勺组合分别获得具有代表性涂片的比例为97%、94%和92%。

相似文献

1
[Quality of conventional PAP smears. Quality assessment and motivation for improvement].[传统巴氏涂片的质量。质量评估与改进的动力]
Pathologe. 2012 Jul;33(4):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s00292-012-1574-z.
2
The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.宫颈细胞刷对巴氏涂片取材充分性的影响。
Fam Pract Res J. 1991 Mar;11(1):57-64.
3
Effect of the sampling sequence on the quality of Papanicolaou smear.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005 Jan-Feb;15(1):66-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1048-891x.2005.14412.x.
4
Should the Cytobrush be used in routine screening for cervical pathology?
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1989 Oct;30(2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(89)90308-1.
5
The quality of the Pap smear.巴氏涂片的质量。
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1992;13(5):445-8.
6
Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.宫颈细胞学检查:四种采样方法的随机对照比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jun;166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91568-u.
7
A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.三种巴氏涂片采集方法的随机对照比较。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Nov;35(4):446-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb02165.x.
8
Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.孕妇宫颈细胞刷和宫颈刷的评估。
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;84(4):539-43.
9
[Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].[宫颈细胞学检查:宫颈刷与传统棉拭子对比]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 1997 Jun 11;86(24):1029-33.
10
Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.宫颈采样的刮板法与非刮板法比较。
Acta Cytol. 1991 Jan-Feb;35(1):69-75.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of screening with conventional Pap smear in Austria - a longitudinal evaluation.奥地利传统巴氏涂片筛查的质量——一项纵向评估。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 23;13:998. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-998.

本文引用的文献

1
Persistent carcinoma in cervical cancer screening: non-participation is the most significant cause.宫颈癌筛查中的持续性癌:未参与是最主要原因。
Acta Cytol. 2011;55(5):433-7. doi: 10.1159/000331811. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
2
Comparison of Pap smear quality with anatomical spatula and convenience (spatula-cytobrush) methods: a single blind clinical trial.巴氏涂片质量与解剖学刮片和便捷式(刮片-细胞刷)方法的比较:一项单盲临床试验。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(6):1769-72.
3
[Reevaluation of cytological smears in patients with cervical cancer. Regional quality assurance program with the cooperation of the Austrian Society for Cytology, the Carinthian Medical Association and the Carinthian Ministry of Health].
Pathologe. 2007 Sep;28(5):339-45. doi: 10.1007/s00292-007-0931-9.
4
European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.欧洲宫颈癌筛查质量保证指南:传统涂片和液基细胞学检查样本采集建议
Cytopathology. 2007 Jun;18(3):133-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00464.x.
5
Pap smear quality parameters of 3 sampling devices used by auxiliary nurse midwives on symptomatic rural Indian women.辅助护士助产士使用的3种采样设备对有症状的印度农村妇女进行巴氏涂片检查的质量参数。
Acta Cytol. 2005 May-Jun;49(3):249-56. doi: 10.1159/000326145.
6
Evaluation of cervical cytology.宫颈细胞学评估
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 1999 Jan(5):1-6.
7
New innovations in cervical cancer screening.宫颈癌筛查的新创新。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Sep;44(3):538-49. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200109000-00009.
8
Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.用于获取宫颈细胞学样本的采集装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(2):CD001036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001036.
9
Comparative evaluation of seven cell collection devices for cervical smears.七种宫颈涂片细胞采集装置的比较评估
Acta Cytol. 1999 Nov-Dec;43(6):1023-6. doi: 10.1159/000331348.
10
Reasons for cervical cancer despite extensive screening.尽管进行了广泛筛查仍患宫颈癌的原因。
J Med Screen. 1996;3(4):204-7. doi: 10.1177/096914139600300409.