Suppr超能文献

芬兰医学出生登记处数据质量评估的多方法途径。

Multi method approach to the assessment of data quality in the Finnish Medical Birth Registry.

作者信息

Teperi J

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Jun;47(3):242-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.3.242.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess comprehensively the validity of the data in the Finnish Medical Birth Registry (MBR) by the combined use of several controls and internal analysis of the data.

DESIGN

The MBR data were individually linked to a medical record sample (n = 775) and to all perinatal death certificates in 1987. The data were also compared with annual hospital statistics. The distributions of birth weights and gestational ages were examined.

SUBJECTS

All stillborn and liveborn babies registered in the MBR in 1987 (n = 59,370).

SETTING

The nationwide MBR data were compared with medical records from one third of the Finnish hospitals, with statistics for all hospitals, and with nationwide cause of death registry data.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

With regard to most variables, the data quality was good or satisfactory (agreement with medical records 95% or more). Allowing for minor deviations in variables with continuous scales improved the agreement rates further. Explanations could be deduced for items with poor agreement values. For most variables, the amount of missing data was less than 1%. With the exception of caesarean sections, medical procedures were registered in only 30 to 72% of the cases, and the proportion varied strongly between the hospitals. Common diagnoses (32 to 86%) and primary causes of death (59 to 78%) were also poorly recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined use of several control materials and internal analyses was successful in investigating the whole data content. The data in the MBR were generally valid but diagnoses and most data on medical procedures were not of sufficiently good quality.

摘要

目的

通过综合使用多种对照方法并对数据进行内部分析,全面评估芬兰医学出生登记处(MBR)数据的有效性。

设计

将MBR数据分别与一份病历样本(n = 775)以及1987年所有围产期死亡证明相链接。数据还与年度医院统计数据进行了比较。检查了出生体重和孕周的分布情况。

研究对象

1987年在MBR登记的所有死产和活产婴儿(n = 59,370)。

研究地点

将全国范围的MBR数据与芬兰三分之一医院的病历、所有医院的统计数据以及全国死因登记数据进行比较。

测量指标及主要结果

对于大多数变量,数据质量良好或令人满意(与病历的一致性达到95%或更高)。考虑到连续变量的微小偏差,一致性率进一步提高。对于一致性值较差的项目可以推导出解释。对于大多数变量,缺失数据量小于1%。除剖宫产外,医疗程序仅在30%至72%的病例中进行了记录,且各医院之间的比例差异很大。常见诊断(32%至86%)和主要死因(59%至78%)的记录也很差。

结论

综合使用多种对照材料和内部分析成功地对整个数据内容进行了调查。MBR中的数据总体上是有效的,但诊断和大多数医疗程序数据的质量不够好。

相似文献

2
Data quality after restructuring a national medical registry.
Scand J Soc Med. 1995 Mar;23(1):75-80. doi: 10.1177/140349489502300113.
6
Data quality of a computerized medical birth registry.
Med Inform (Lond). 1994 Oct-Dec;19(4):323-30. doi: 10.3109/14639239409025337.
7
A quality study of a computerized medical birth registry.
J Obstet Gynaecol (Tokyo 1995). 1995 Feb;21(1):23-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1995.tb00893.x.
8
Using a State Birth Registry as a Quality Improvement Tool.将州出生登记处用作质量改进工具。
Am J Perinatol. 2017 Aug;34(10):958-965. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1600898. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
9
A quality study of a medical birth registry.一项医疗出生登记处的质量研究。
Scand J Soc Med. 1990 Jun;18(2):143-8. doi: 10.1177/140349489001800209.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
The validity of the medical record.病历的有效性。
Med Care. 1981 Mar;19(3):310-5. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198103000-00006.
8
Gestational interval from vital records.来自生命记录的妊娠间隔。
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1970 Aug;60(8):1496-505. doi: 10.2105/ajph.60.8.1496.
10
The appropriateness of using a medical procedure. Is information in the medical record valid?
Med Care. 1987 Mar;25(3):196-201. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198703000-00003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验