Cagenello R, Arditi A, Halpern D L
Vision Research Laboratory, Lighthouse, Inc., New York, New York 10017.
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1993 Aug;10(8):1841-8. doi: 10.1364/josaa.10.001841.
Using a computerized test system, we compared binocular and monocular visual optotype acuity, varying both contrast and contrast disparity between the two eyes. When contrast was the same in the two eyes, binocular acuity was better than best monocular acuity by an average of 0.045 log minimum angle of resolution, or 11%. When contrast differed in the two eyes, binocular acuity in most but not all cases was still better than the monocular acuity of the eye that received the higher contrast. This binocular advantage became smaller but remained significant as contrast disparity became larger. These results are most simply explained by threshold contrast summation of high-spatial-frequency letter components.
我们使用计算机化测试系统,比较了双眼和单眼视觉视标视力,同时改变两眼之间的对比度和对比度差异。当两眼对比度相同时,双眼视力比最佳单眼视力平均好0.045对数最小分辨角,即11%。当两眼对比度不同时,在大多数但并非所有情况下,双眼视力仍优于接受较高对比度的单眼视力。随着对比度差异增大,这种双眼优势变小但仍显著。这些结果最简单的解释是高空间频率字母成分的阈值对比度总和。