Sternberg C N, de Mulder P H, van Oosterom A T, Fossa S D, Giannarelli D, Soedirman J R
Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Ann Oncol. 1993 May;4(5):403-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058520.
The M-VAC regimen (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin) has significant antitumor activity in patients with advanced urothelial tract cancer. Growth factors may provide the possibility of treating patients with higher doses of chemotherapy, for longer periods, with less morbidity, and improved results. A trial of an escalated dosage of M-VAC with recombinant GM-CSF (rhGM-CSF) was initiated.
23 patients were treated with an escalated dose of M-VAC every 2 weeks plus rhGM-CSF 250 micrograms/m2 s.c. days 4-10. Dose level I (n = 13) was 1.65 times the dose of standard M-VAC. Adriamycin and cisplatin were given at 2.5 times the dose of standard M-VAC. Dose level II (n = 10) was a relative dose intensity of 1.95. Adriamycin and cisplatin were both given at 2.9 times the dose.
The response rate was 70% (95% CI 60%-80%). Seven patients (30%) had CR, and 9 (39%) had a PR. Five (22%) patients had stable disease and 2 (9%) had progression. Of the CR patients, 3 had the CR confirmed pathologically (CRp). Response occurred in 11 patients treated at dose level I and 5 at dose level II. Toxicity was primarily hematologic. Dose level II was too toxic due to thrombocytopenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was minimal. The value of this schedule (dose level I) compared to standard M-VAC will be further evaluated in a randomized trial to be initiated by the Genitourinary Group of the EORTC.
M-VAC方案(甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、阿霉素和顺铂)对晚期尿路上皮癌患者具有显著的抗肿瘤活性。生长因子可能为用更高剂量化疗、更长疗程、更低发病率及更好疗效治疗患者提供可能性。于是开展了一项使用重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(rhGM-CSF)递增剂量的M-VAC试验。
23例患者每2周接受递增剂量的M-VAC治疗,加用rhGM-CSF 250微克/平方米,皮下注射,第4至10天。剂量水平I(n = 13)为标准M-VAC剂量的1.65倍。阿霉素和顺铂的给药剂量为标准M-VAC剂量的2.5倍。剂量水平II(n = 10)的相对剂量强度为1.95。阿霉素和顺铂均按2.9倍剂量给药。
缓解率为70%(95%可信区间60%-80%)。7例患者(30%)完全缓解,9例(39%)部分缓解。5例(22%)患者病情稳定,2例(9%)病情进展。在完全缓解的患者中,3例经病理证实为完全缓解(CRp)。剂量水平I治疗的11例患者和剂量水平II治疗的5例患者出现缓解。毒性主要为血液学毒性。由于血小板减少,剂量水平II毒性过大。非血液学毒性极小。与标准M-VAC相比,该方案(剂量水平I)的价值将在欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)泌尿生殖组即将开展的一项随机试验中进一步评估。