Camus C, Leport C, Raffi F, Michelet C, Cartier F, Vilde J L
Service de Réanimation Médicale et Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Jul;17(1):46-55. doi: 10.1093/clinids/17.1.46.
We reviewed the data on 26 patients with permanent endocardial pacemakers who had 28 episodes of bacteremia to determine whether removal of the wire is required. Patients recovered completely from the first episode in seven of 20 cases of staphylococcal bacteremia and in six of six cases of nonstaphylococcal bacteremia (P = .015). Definitive cure was not achieved during the first episode in seven cases of staphylococcal bacteremia related to the pacing system when the wire was not withdrawn; however, cure was achieved in five of six cases when the whole pacemaker was removed (P < .01). The duration of treatment was longer for the patients from whom the wire was not removed during the first episode (P < .01). Whether cases of staphylococcal bacteremia were related to the pacing system or not, the rate of recovery of the responsible microorganism from the wires was similar for both groups of patients (six [82%] of seven and three [75%] of four, respectively). Nonstaphylococcal bacteremia was unrelated to the pacing system in five of six cases; these patients were all cured without removal of the wire.
我们回顾了26例植入永久性心内膜起搏器且发生28次菌血症的患者的数据,以确定是否需要拔除导线。在20例葡萄球菌菌血症患者中的7例以及6例非葡萄球菌菌血症患者中的6例,患者从首次发作中完全康复(P = 0.015)。7例与起搏系统相关的葡萄球菌菌血症患者在首次发作时未拔除导线,则未实现彻底治愈;然而,当整个起搏器被移除时,6例患者中的5例实现了治愈(P < 0.01)。首次发作时未拔除导线的患者治疗时间更长(P < 0.01)。无论葡萄球菌菌血症病例是否与起搏系统相关,两组患者导线中致病微生物的检出率相似(分别为7例中的6例[82%]和4例中的3例[75%])。6例非葡萄球菌菌血症患者中有5例与起搏系统无关;这些患者均未拔除导线就实现了治愈。