Christensen M A, Sutton K R
Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA 95128.
Am J Crit Care. 1993 Jan;2(1):28-34.
Myocardial contusion is diagnosed with one or a combination of four diagnostic procedures: electrocardiography, echocardiography, creatine kinase MB fractions and/or radionuclide procedures. This article presents a critical review of 18 recent studies addressing the utility, sensitivity and specificity of these tests. Careful review suggests that clinically significant myocardial contusions as a result of blunt trauma are rare and may be detected simply and inexpensively using electrocardiography and careful physical examination. Serum myocardial enzymes and radionuclide studies are nonspecific and are not predictive of cardiac complications. Echocardiography is useful in the management of myocardial decompensation but not as a primary screening tool in blunt cardiac injury. Cost comparisons, resource allocation and implications for critical care practice are discussed.
心电图、超声心动图、肌酸激酶同工酶和/或放射性核素检查。本文对最近18项关于这些检查的实用性、敏感性和特异性的研究进行了批判性综述。仔细审查表明,钝性创伤导致的具有临床意义的心肌挫伤很少见,使用心电图和仔细的体格检查即可简单且低成本地检测出来。血清心肌酶和放射性核素检查不具有特异性,也不能预测心脏并发症。超声心动图在心肌失代偿的管理中有用,但不作为钝性心脏损伤的主要筛查工具。文中还讨论了成本比较、资源分配以及对重症监护实践的影响。