• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于家庭的急性精神科服务对照试验。I:临床和社会结局。

A controlled trial of home-based acute psychiatric services. I: Clinical and social outcome.

作者信息

Burns T, Beadsmoore A, Bhat A V, Oliver A, Mathers C

机构信息

St George's Hospital Medical School, London.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;163:49-54. doi: 10.1192/bjp.163.1.49.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.163.1.49
PMID:8353699
Abstract

While research has shown community-based psychiatric care to be as good as, or better than, hospital-based care, generalisation to clinical practice has been difficult. This prospective, randomised controlled study examined a community-based approach feasible within NHS conditions. Ninety-four patients were randomly allocated to experimental and 78 to control treatments and followed for one year. The groups were well matched apart from an excess of psychotic control patients. No differences in clinical or social functioning outcome were found. Both groups improved substantially on clinical measures in the first six weeks, with some slow consolidation thereafter. There were three suicides in the control group and one in the experimental group. Access to care was better in the experimental group (93% attended assessment) than in the control group (75% attended assessment).

摘要

虽然研究表明,基于社区的精神科护理与基于医院的护理一样好,甚至更好,但要将其推广到临床实践却很困难。这项前瞻性随机对照研究检验了一种在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)条件下可行的基于社区的方法。94名患者被随机分配到试验组,78名患者被分配到对照组,并随访一年。除了对照组中精神疾病患者过多外,两组匹配良好。未发现临床或社会功能结局存在差异。两组在最初六周的临床指标上都有显著改善,此后改善速度有所放缓。对照组有3例自杀,试验组有1例自杀。试验组的护理可及性(93%的患者参加了评估)优于对照组(75%的患者参加了评估)。

相似文献

1
A controlled trial of home-based acute psychiatric services. I: Clinical and social outcome.一项基于家庭的急性精神科服务对照试验。I:临床和社会结局。
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;163:49-54. doi: 10.1192/bjp.163.1.49.
2
A controlled trial of home-based acute psychiatric services. II: Treatment patterns and costs.一项基于家庭的急性精神科服务对照试验。II:治疗模式与成本。
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;163:55-61. doi: 10.1192/bjp.163.1.55.
3
The effect of personality disorder on clinical outcome, social networks and adjustment: a controlled clinical trial of psychiatric emergencies.人格障碍对临床结局、社交网络及适应的影响:一项精神科急诊的对照临床试验
Psychol Med. 1994 Aug;24(3):731-40. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700027884.
4
Early intervention in psychiatric emergencies: a controlled clinical trial.精神科急诊的早期干预:一项对照临床试验。
Lancet. 1992 May 30;339(8805):1311-4. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91959-c.
5
Home based care and standard hospital care for patients with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial.重度精神疾病患者的居家护理与标准医院护理:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ. 1992 Mar 21;304(6829):749-54. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6829.749.
6
Randomised controlled trial of day and in-patient psychiatric treatment. 2: Comparison of two hospitals.
Br J Psychiatry. 1991 Feb;158:183-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.158.2.183.
7
Randomised controlled trial of two models of care for discharged psychiatric patients.针对出院精神科患者的两种护理模式的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 1998 Jan 10;316(7125):106-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.106.
8
Psychiatric hospital versus community treatment: the results of a randomised trial.精神病院治疗与社区治疗:一项随机试验的结果
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1983 Jun;17(2):160-7. doi: 10.3109/00048678309160000.
9
Home-based versus out-patient/in-patient care for people with serious mental illness. Phase II of a controlled study.针对严重精神疾病患者的居家护理与门诊/住院护理对比。一项对照研究的第二阶段。
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Aug;165(2):204-10. doi: 10.1192/bjp.165.2.204.
10
Community psychiatric nurses in primary health care.基层医疗保健中的社区精神科护士。
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Aug;165(2):231-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.165.2.231.

引用本文的文献

1
Intensive case management for severe mental illness.严重精神疾病的强化个案管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 6;1(1):CD007906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub3.
2
Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses.针对严重精神疾病患者的危机干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 3;2015(12):CD001087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001087.pub5.
3
Effectiveness and efficiency of assertive outreach for Schizophrenia in Germany: study protocol on a pragmatic quasi-experimental controlled trial.
德国精神分裂症肯定性外联的效果和效率:一项实用准实验对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Feb 15;13:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-56.
4
Effectiveness of a low-intensity home-based aftercare for patients with severe mental disorders: a 12-month randomized controlled study.基于家庭的低强度康复治疗对严重精神障碍患者的效果:一项为期 12 个月的随机对照研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2012 Dec;48(6):766-70. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012-9516-z. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
5
Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses.针对严重精神疾病患者的危机干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;5(5):CD001087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001087.pub4.
6
Life skills programmes for chronic mental illnesses.慢性精神疾病的生活技能项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD000381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000381.pub3.
7
Intensive case management for severe mental illness.严重精神疾病的强化个案管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD007906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub2.
8
Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality.为患有严重精神疾病和人格障碍者设立的社区心理健康团队。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD000270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000270.pub2.
9
Comparison of quality of life for people with schizophrenia and mental health of caregivers beteen commn-based and hospital-based services.社区服务与医院服务模式下精神分裂症患者生活质量及照料者心理健康状况的比较
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2004 Sep;20(9):443-51. doi: 10.1016/s1607-551x(09)70183-4.
10
Effectiveness of home treatment in children and adolescents with externalizing psychiatric disorders.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;10 Suppl 1:I80-90. doi: 10.1007/s007870170009.