Burns T, Raftery J, Beadsmoore A, McGuigan S, Dickson M
Department of Mental Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London.
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;163:55-61. doi: 10.1192/bjp.163.1.55.
Treatment records of 94 patients treated in an experimental home-based psychiatric service and 78 control patients in standard care were collected over one year. There was a substantial reduction in in-patient care in the experimental group, both in terms of proportion admitted and duration of admissions, despite similar out-patient and general practice care. The total treatment costs were significantly larger (> 50%) for standard care when controlled for by diagnostic grouping. Costs were further examined by including all specialist psychiatric care, and by excluding patients with primary diagnoses of brain damage or alcoholism. Sensitivity analysis explored the effects of increasing the cost of home visits. The relative cost effectiveness of the experimental service persisted. Clinical and social outcome was similar in control and experimental groups.
收集了在一项基于家庭的实验性精神科服务中接受治疗的94名患者以及接受标准护理的78名对照患者的一年治疗记录。尽管门诊和全科医疗护理相似,但实验组的住院护理在入院比例和住院时长方面都大幅减少。按诊断分组进行控制时,标准护理的总治疗成本显著更高(>50%)。通过纳入所有专科精神科护理以及排除原发性脑损伤或酗酒诊断的患者进一步检查成本。敏感性分析探讨了增加家访成本的影响。实验性服务的相对成本效益依然存在。对照组和实验组的临床和社会结局相似。