Yang X, HayGlass K T
Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
J Immunoassay. 1993 Sep;14(3):129-48. doi: 10.1080/15321819308019845.
Three assays of murine IFN gamma are compared in terms of sensitivity, intra- and inter-assay variability, specificity and simplicity. The widely used viral inhibition assay requires 48 hours, necessitates continuous maintenance and optimization of fibroblast growth, and exhibits the lowest sensitivity. Inhibition of WEHI-279 B cell [3H]thymidine incorporation requires 48-60 hours to quantitate IFN gamma production, can be subject to non-specific inhibition, and is also labor intensive. In both bioassays, specificity must be determined by the analysis of duplicate samples in the presence of neutralizing, IFN gamma-specific mAb. In contrast, a 24 hour, dual mAb ELISA, in which IFN gamma is captured by immobilized, purified rat IgG1 XMG 1.2 mAb and identified with biotinylated mAb R4-6A2 and streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase detects IFN gamma production > 0.05 U/ml. The quantitative range in this assay is typically from 1-100 U/ml. In addition to providing the greatest specificity and shortest duration, this ELISA exhibits the lowest coefficient of variation of the three assays compared. Collectively, assay characteristics such as sensitivity, absence of interference by other proteins, reproducibility, speed and simplicity support the conclusion that this dual mAb based sandwich ELISA represents a substantial improvement over inhibition of viral cytopathic effect or inhibition of WEHI-279 bioassays for characterization of antigen- or mitogen-driven IFN gamma production.
对三种小鼠干扰素γ检测方法在灵敏度、批内和批间变异性、特异性及简易性方面进行了比较。广泛使用的病毒抑制检测法需要48小时,需要持续维持和优化成纤维细胞生长,且灵敏度最低。抑制WEHI-279 B细胞[3H]胸苷掺入来定量干扰素γ产生需要48 - 60小时,可能会受到非特异性抑制,且劳动强度大。在这两种生物检测法中,特异性必须通过在存在中和性、干扰素γ特异性单克隆抗体的情况下对重复样本进行分析来确定。相比之下,一种24小时的双抗体酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),其中干扰素γ被固定化的纯化大鼠IgG1 XMG 1.2单克隆抗体捕获,并用生物素化单克隆抗体R4 - 6A2和链霉亲和素 - 碱性磷酸酶进行鉴定,可检测到>0.05 U/ml的干扰素γ产生。该检测法的定量范围通常为1 - 100 U/ml。除了具有最高的特异性和最短的检测时间外,与所比较的三种检测法相比,这种ELISA的变异系数最低。总体而言,诸如灵敏度、不受其他蛋白质干扰、可重复性、速度和简易性等检测特性支持这样的结论,即这种基于双抗体的夹心ELISA在表征抗原或丝裂原驱动的干扰素γ产生方面,相对于病毒细胞病变效应抑制或WEHI-279生物检测法有了实质性改进。