Suppr超能文献

使用三种生物指示剂和三种化学指示剂对快速灭菌的快速读数生物指示剂进行评估。

Evaluation of a rapid readout biological indicator for flash sterilization with three biological indicators and three chemical indicators.

作者信息

Rutala W A, Gergen M F, Weber D J

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill 27599-7030.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1993 Jul;14(7):390-4. doi: 10.1086/646767.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Flash sterilization is most commonly used for emergency sterilization of unwrapped items in a gravity displacement sterilizer for three minutes. Sterilization quality assurance is monitored by biological indicators that require a 24-hour incubation prior to reading. In this study, we compared a new biological indicator that provides results within 60 minutes with three conventional, 24-hour biological indicators for monitoring flash sterilization and three chemical indicators.

DESIGN

Conventional biological indicators tested included the conventional Attest 1261, Proof Flash and Assert, while the rapid readout indicator tested was Attest 1291. Attest Rapid Readout detects the presence of a Bacillus stearothermophilus enzyme by reading a fluorescent product that is produced by the enzymatic break-down of a nonfluorescent substrate. Chemical indicators tested included Comply, Incheque, and Thermalog S. Survival at 132 degrees C in a gravity displacement sterilizer was measured by media color change after incubation for 24 hours at 56 degrees C for the three conventional biological indicators, fluorescence at 60 minutes for the Attest Rapid Readout biological indicator, and color change for the chemical indicators. Each exposure time was replicated four times with 10 of each biological and chemical indicator per run.

RESULTS

The conventional biological indicators (Attest, Proof Flash, and Assert) had 90%, 48%, and 40% spore survival at two minutes exposure; 23%, 3%, and 0% at three minutes exposure; and 3%, 0%, and 0% at four minutes exposure respectively. The Attest Rapid Readout biological indicator had 88%, 33%, and 0% enzyme activity detectable at 2, 3, and 4 minutes exposure. The chemical indicators Comply, Incheque, and Thermalog S revealed sterilization failure rates of 100%, 100%, and 100% at 0 minutes exposure; 100%, 100%, and 45% at one minute; 0%, 0%, and 28% at two minutes exposure; 0%, 0%, and 18% at three minutes exposure; and 0%, 0%, and 0% at four minutes exposure, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity of the Attest Rapid Readout parallels the conventional biological indicators. These data suggest that a 60-minute rapid readout biological indicator is equivalent to the 24-hour biological indicators. If further studies demonstrate that a four-minute flash sterilization cycle provides a needed safety margin to ensure sterilization, then consideration should be given to requiring a four-minute flash sterilization cycle. Chemical indicators were too sensitive to the processing conditions (eg, steam) and are inadequate to ensure adequate sterilization.

摘要

目的

快速灭菌最常用于在重力置换式灭菌器中对未包装物品进行三分钟的紧急灭菌。灭菌质量保证通过生物指示剂进行监测,读取结果前需24小时培养。在本研究中,我们将一种60分钟内出结果的新型生物指示剂与三种传统的24小时生物指示剂及三种化学指示剂进行比较,以监测快速灭菌效果。

设计

测试的传统生物指示剂包括传统的Attest 1261、Proof Flash和Assert,而测试的快速读数指示剂是Attest 1291。Attest快速读数通过读取由非荧光底物酶解产生的荧光产物来检测嗜热脂肪芽孢杆菌酶的存在。测试的化学指示剂包括Comply、Incheque和Thermalog S。对于三种传统生物指示剂,在重力置换式灭菌器中132℃下的存活情况通过在56℃下培养24小时后培养基颜色变化来测量;对于Attest快速读数生物指示剂,在60分钟时测量荧光;对于化学指示剂,测量颜色变化。每个暴露时间重复四次,每次运行每种生物和化学指示剂各10个。

结果

传统生物指示剂(Attest、Proof Flash和Assert)在两分钟暴露时的孢子存活率分别为90%、48%和40%;三分钟暴露时分别为23%、3%和0%;四分钟暴露时分别为3%、0%和0%。Attest快速读数生物指示剂在2、3和4分钟暴露时可检测到的酶活性分别为88%、33%和0%。化学指示剂Comply、Incheque和Thermalog S在零分钟暴露时的灭菌失败率分别为100%、100%和100%;一分钟时分别为100%、100%和45%;两分钟暴露时分别为0%、0%和28%;三分钟暴露时分别为0%、0%和18%;四分钟暴露时分别为0%、0%和0%。

结论

Attest快速读数的敏感性与传统生物指示剂相当。这些数据表明,60分钟快速读数生物指示剂等同于24小时生物指示剂。如果进一步研究表明四分钟快速灭菌周期能提供确保灭菌所需的安全裕度,那么应考虑要求采用四分钟快速灭菌周期。化学指示剂对处理条件(如蒸汽)过于敏感,不足以确保充分灭菌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验