Laumer R, Steinmeier R, Gönner F, Vogtmann T, Priem R, Fahlbusch R
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
Neurosurgery. 1993 Jul;33(1):1-8; discussion 8-9. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199307000-00001.
During recent years, the management of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has changed, resulting in an increase in early operations and routine administration of nimodipine. Both influenced the indication for transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD). Furthermore, investigations detected discrepancies between Doppler findings and neurological status. In a prospective study, the reliability of TCD was investigated in patients with SAH treated with intravenously administered nimodipine. Patients with large hematomas were excluded. Neurological deficits immediately after surgery or within the first 48 hours were classified as not delayed, and therefore not necessarily due to vasospasm. The most remarkable points of this study are that there is no significant difference between the flow velocities for Hunt and Hess Grades I and II when compared with those for Grade III, and that Grades IV and V seem to be affiliated with the lowest velocities. When the flow velocities of 11 patients who developed delayed ischemic deficits (DIDs) were compared with those of patients with no deficit, no significant difference was seen. A significant increase in velocity in the days before the onset of DID was found only in 3 of 11 cases. Eight patients showed either constant high or constant low velocities or even, in some cases, decreasing time courses. High flow velocities did not necessarily mean impending neurological deficits: 8 of 66 patients tolerated flow velocities over 200 cm/s. Therefore, it no longer seems to be justified to proclaim that TCD is able to predict neurological deficits, although it is doubtless able to detect vasospasm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
近年来,蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的治疗方式发生了变化,导致早期手术和尼莫地平常规给药有所增加。这两者都影响了经颅多普勒超声(TCD)的应用指征。此外,研究发现多普勒检查结果与神经状态之间存在差异。在一项前瞻性研究中,对静脉注射尼莫地平治疗的SAH患者的TCD可靠性进行了调查。排除了有大量血肿的患者。术后立即或术后48小时内出现的神经功能缺损被归类为非延迟性,因此不一定是由血管痉挛引起的。这项研究最显著的要点是,与Ⅲ级相比,Hunt和Hess Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级的血流速度没有显著差异,而且Ⅳ级和Ⅴ级的血流速度似乎最低。将11例出现延迟性缺血性缺损(DID)患者的血流速度与无缺损患者的血流速度进行比较,未发现显著差异。仅在11例中的3例中发现DID发作前几天血流速度有显著增加。8例患者表现为持续高流速或持续低流速,甚至在某些情况下流速呈下降趋势。高流速不一定意味着即将出现神经功能缺损:66例患者中有8例耐受流速超过200 cm/s。因此,尽管TCD无疑能够检测到血管痉挛,但宣称其能够预测神经功能缺损似乎不再合理。(摘要截选至250字)