• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年医疗保险受益人中,胆囊切除术中附带的阑尾切除术。

Appendectomy incidental to cholecystectomy among elderly Medicare beneficiaries.

作者信息

Warren J L, Penberthy L T, Addiss D G, McBean A M

机构信息

Epidemiology Branch, Health Care Financing Administration, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Sep;177(3):288-94.

PMID:8356501
Abstract

To assess the risks of adverse outcomes after appendectomy incidental to cholecystectomy among elderly Medicare beneficiaries, 8,936 persons undergoing cholecystectomy with incidental appendectomy and 44,461 persons undergoing cholecystectomy without incidental appendectomy were studied. Controlling for age, race, gender and co-morbidity status, the risk for wound infection in persons with incidental appendectomy was 83 percent higher than in persons without incidental appendectomy (95 percent confidence interval, 1.53 to 2.18). The risks for having other adverse outcomes, including other infections, extensive intrahospital complications and mortality rate at 30 days, were also higher for the former group, although these differences were not statistically significant. In addition, the demographic characteristics and health status of persons undergoing cholecystectomy with incidental appendectomy with persons undergoing cholecystectomy only were compared. Males, persons of younger ages, of white race or with no co-morbid conditions, were significantly more likely to undergo cholecystectomy with incidental appendectomy. Variables to control for differences in the demographic characteristics and health status between persons receiving and not receiving incidental appendectomy were included in the regression models for adverse outcomes. However, these models may not completely control for differences between the two groups. As a result, the actual relationship between incidental appendectomy and adverse outcomes may be underestimated. The preventive effect of incidental appendectomy on morbidity and mortality rates from future instances of appendicitis was assessed by determining the remaining lifetime risk for acute appendicitis. For persons 65 to 69 years of age, 115 incidental appendectomies would be required to prevent one future instance of appendicitis and 4,472 incidental appendectomies would be needed to prevent a single future death from acute appendicitis. Because incidental appendectomy increases the risk for wound infection among persons undergoing cholecystectomy and because the lifetime risk for acute appendicitis is relatively low for persons of this age group, surgeons should carefully consider the risks and benefits of incidental appendectomy in the elderly.

摘要

为评估老年医疗保险受益人群中胆囊切除术中附带阑尾切除术后出现不良后果的风险,研究了8936例行胆囊切除术并附带阑尾切除术的患者以及44461例行胆囊切除术但未附带阑尾切除术的患者。在控制年龄、种族、性别和合并症状况后,附带阑尾切除术患者的伤口感染风险比未附带阑尾切除术患者高83%(95%置信区间为1.53至2.18)。前一组出现其他不良后果的风险,包括其他感染、严重院内并发症和30天死亡率,也更高,尽管这些差异无统计学意义。此外,还比较了行胆囊切除术并附带阑尾切除术患者与仅行胆囊切除术患者的人口统计学特征和健康状况。男性、年龄较小者、白人或无合并症者行胆囊切除术并附带阑尾切除术的可能性显著更高。在不良后果回归模型中纳入了用于控制接受和未接受附带阑尾切除术患者人口统计学特征和健康状况差异的变量。然而,这些模型可能无法完全控制两组之间的差异。因此,附带阑尾切除术与不良后果之间的实际关系可能被低估。通过确定未来患急性阑尾炎的终生风险,评估了附带阑尾切除术对未来阑尾炎发病率和死亡率的预防效果。对于65至69岁的人群,需要进行115次附带阑尾切除术才能预防未来一例阑尾炎,需要进行4472次附带阑尾切除术才能预防一例因急性阑尾炎导致的未来死亡。由于附带阑尾切除术会增加胆囊切除术患者的伤口感染风险,且该年龄组人群患急性阑尾炎的终生风险相对较低,外科医生应仔细权衡老年患者附带阑尾切除术的风险和益处。

相似文献

1
Appendectomy incidental to cholecystectomy among elderly Medicare beneficiaries.老年医疗保险受益人中,胆囊切除术中附带的阑尾切除术。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Sep;177(3):288-94.
2
Is incidental appendectomy a safe practice?
Can J Surg. 1988 Nov;31(6):448-51.
3
Incidental appendectomy with cholecystectomy: is the increased risk justified?阑尾切除术联合胆囊切除术:增加的风险是否合理?
Am Surg. 1987 Oct;53(10):553-7.
4
Incidental appendectomy?--Yes.偶然进行的阑尾切除术?——是的。
Can J Surg. 1981 Mar;24(2):191-2.
5
Insurance status and race represent independent predictors of undergoing laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis: secondary data analysis of 145,546 patients.保险状况和种族是阑尾炎患者接受腹腔镜手术的独立预测因素:对145,546例患者的二次数据分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Oct;199(4):567-75; discussion 575-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.06.023.
6
Guidelines for therapeutic decision in incidental appendectomy.意外阑尾切除术中治疗决策指南。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Jul;171(1):95-8.
7
Is acute appendicitis a surgical emergency?急性阑尾炎是外科急症吗?
Am Surg. 2007 Jun;73(6):626-9; discussion 629-30.
8
Clinical versus sonographic evaluation of acute appendicitis in children: a comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes.儿童急性阑尾炎的临床评估与超声评估:患者特征及结局比较
J Pediatr Surg. 2001 May;36(5):780-3. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.22960.
9
Incidental appendectomy during nephrectomy for Wilms' tumor.肾母细胞瘤肾切除术中的意外阑尾切除术。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 May;176(5):423-6.
10
Laparoscopic incidental appendectomy.
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Jun;1(2):116-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Concurrent Ventral Hernia Repair and Cholecystectomy Compared to Ventral Hernia Repair Alone.同期腹疝修补术与胆囊切除术联合单独腹疝修补术的疗效比较。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 21;15(9):e45699. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45699. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic appendectomy: a Markov model.预防性阑尾切除术的成本效益:一个马尔可夫模型。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3596-3604. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5391-y. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
3
Outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and ventral hernia repair compared to that of laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术同期与单纯腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗腹疝的效果比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2408-z. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
4
Combined procedures with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合手术
Indian J Surg. 2010 Oct;72(5):377-80. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0117-1. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
5
Incidental appendectomy--yes or no? A retrospective case study and review of the literature.偶然发现的阑尾切除术——做还是不做?一项回顾性病例研究及文献综述。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1998;6(1):30-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(1998)6:1<30::AID-IDOG7>3.0.CO;2-B.