VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction Veterans Affairs Hospital, White River Junction, VT, USA.
Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3596-3604. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5391-y. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery performed in the USA. Removal of a non-inflamed appendix during unrelated abdominal surgery (prophylactic or incidental appendectomy) can prevent the downstream risks and costs of appendicitis. It is unknown whether such a strategy could be cost saving for the health system.
We considered hypothetical patient cohorts of varying ages from 18 to 80, undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic procedures. A Markov decision model using cost per life-year as the main outcome measure was constructed to simulate the trade-off between cost and risk of prophylactic appendectomy and the ongoing risk of developing appendicitis, with downstream costs and risks. Rates, probabilities, and costs of disease, treatment, and outcomes by patient age and gender were extracted from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using complications and costs of prophylactic appendectomy.
With our base-case assumptions, including added cost of prophylactic appendectomy of $660, we find that prophylactic removal of the appendix is cost saving for males aged 18-27 and females aged 18-28 undergoing elective surgery. The margin of cost savings depends on remaining life-years and increases exponentially with age: a 20-year-old female undergoing elective surgery could save $130 over a lifetime by undergoing prophylactic appendectomy, while a 40-year-old female would lose $130 over a lifetime. When the risk of the prophylactic appendectomy exceeds the risk of laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis or the cost exceeds $1080, it becomes more cost saving to forego the prophylactic procedure.
Prophylactic appendectomy can be cost saving for patients younger than age thirty undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic procedures.
在美国,阑尾切除术是最常见的急诊手术。在非相关腹部手术(预防性或偶发性阑尾切除术)中切除未发炎的阑尾,可以预防阑尾炎的下游风险和成本。目前尚不清楚这种策略是否可以为医疗系统节省成本。
我们考虑了年龄在 18 至 80 岁之间的不同年龄组的假想患者队列,他们接受择期腹腔镜腹部和盆腔手术。使用成本效益分析作为主要结果指标的马尔可夫决策模型来模拟预防性阑尾切除术的成本与风险之间的权衡,以及不断发展的阑尾炎的风险,以及下游的成本和风险。从文献中提取了按患者年龄和性别划分的疾病、治疗和结果的发生率、概率和成本。使用预防性阑尾切除术的并发症和成本进行了敏感性分析。
在我们的基本假设中,包括预防性阑尾切除术的额外成本为 660 美元,我们发现,对于接受择期手术的 18-27 岁男性和 18-28 岁女性,预防性切除阑尾可以节省成本。节省成本的幅度取决于剩余的寿命年数,并随年龄呈指数增长:接受择期手术的 20 岁女性通过预防性阑尾切除术可以在一生中节省 130 美元,而 40 岁女性则会损失 130 美元。当预防性阑尾切除术的风险超过腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎的风险或成本超过 1080 美元时,放弃预防性手术更为节省成本。
对于接受择期腹腔镜腹部和盆腔手术的 30 岁以下患者,预防性阑尾切除术可以节省成本。