Corey G R, Campbell P T, Van Trigt P, Kenney R T, O'Connor C M, Sheikh K H, Kisslo J A, Wall T C
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Am J Med. 1993 Aug;95(2):209-13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90262-n.
To determine the effectiveness of the preoperative evaluation and overall diagnostic efficacy of subxiphoid pericardial biopsy with fluid drainage in patients with new, large pericardial effusions.
A prospective interventional case series of consecutive patients admitted with new, large pericardial effusions.
Fifty-seven of 75 consecutive patients admitted to a university tertiary-care center and a university-affiliated Veterans Administration Medical Center with new, large pericardial effusions were studied over a 20-month period. Each patient was assessed by a comprehensive preoperative evaluation followed by subxiphoid pericardiotomy. The patients' tissue and fluid samples were studied pathologically and cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, fungi, mycobacteria, mycoplasmas, and viruses.
A diagnosis was made in 53 (93%) patients. The principle diagnoses consisted of malignancy in 13 (23%) patients; viral infection in 8 (14%) patients; radiation-induced inflammation in 8 (14%) patients; collagen-vascular disease in 7 (12%) patients; and uremia in 7 (12%) patients. No diagnosis was made in four (7%) patients. A variety of unexpected organisms were cultured from either pericardial fluid or tissue: cytomegalovirus (three), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (two), herpes simplex virus (one), Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare (one), and Mycobacterium chelonei (one). The pericardial fluid yielded a diagnosis in 15 (26%) patients, 11 of whom had malignant effusions. The examination of pericardial tissue was useful in the diagnosis of 13 (23%) patients, 8 of whom had an infectious agent cultured. Of the 57 patients undergoing surgery, the combined diagnostic yield from both fluid and tissue was 19 patients (33%).
A systematic preoperative evaluation in conjunction with fluid and tissue analysis following subxiphoid pericardiotomy yields a diagnosis in the majority of patients with large pericardial effusions. This approach may also result in the culturing of "unusual" infectious organisms from pericardial tissue and fluid.
确定剑突下心包活检并引流对新发大量心包积液患者的术前评估效果及总体诊断效能。
对因新发大量心包积液入院的连续患者进行的前瞻性干预病例系列研究。
在20个月期间,对一所大学三级医疗中心和一所大学附属退伍军人管理局医疗中心收治的75例因新发大量心包积液入院的连续患者中的57例进行了研究。每位患者均接受全面的术前评估,随后进行剑突下心包切开术。对患者的组织和液体样本进行病理研究,并培养需氧菌、厌氧菌、真菌、分枝杆菌、支原体和病毒。
53例(93%)患者确诊。主要诊断包括:13例(23%)为恶性肿瘤;8例(14%)为病毒感染;8例(14%)为放射性炎症;7例(12%)为胶原血管病;7例(12%)为尿毒症。4例(7%)患者未确诊。心包液或组织培养出多种意外病原体:巨细胞病毒(3例)、肺炎支原体(2例)、单纯疱疹病毒(1例)、鸟分枝杆菌复合群(1例)和龟分枝杆菌(1例)。心包液确诊15例(26%)患者,其中11例为恶性积液。心包组织检查对13例(23%)患者的诊断有帮助,其中8例培养出感染病原体。在接受手术的57例患者中,液体和组织的联合诊断率为19例(33%)。
剑突下心包切开术后进行系统的术前评估并结合液体和组织分析,可使大多数大量心包积液患者得到确诊。这种方法还可能从心包组织和液体中培养出“不常见”的感染病原体。