Suppr超能文献

确定美国危重症护理协会90年代的研究重点。

Determining AACN's research priorities for the 90s.

作者信息

Lindquist R, Banasik J, Barnsteiner J, Beecroft P C, Prevost S, Riegel B, Sechrist K, Strzelecki C, Titler M

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 1993 Mar;2(2):110-7.

PMID:8358458
Abstract

The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses completed a three-phased process of priority identification for critical care nursing research. In phase 1, a 78-item survey was generated following a comprehensive review of potential research topics. In phase 2, approximately 1000 critical care nurses rated each item on the survey for importance to critical care nursing. Based on these results, the AACN Research Committee formulated a clinical and a nonclinical (contextual) list of research topics. Each list contained 25 topics. In phase 3, topics were given final rankings at a 1-day Consensus Conference on Research Priorities. Both Likert-type and magnitude estimation scaling were used to determine priority ranking of items on each list. As a result, both clinical and contextual research priorities were established for AACN.

摘要

美国重症护理护士协会完成了一个分三个阶段的重症护理研究重点识别过程。在第一阶段,在对潜在研究主题进行全面审查后生成了一份包含78个条目的调查问卷。在第二阶段,约1000名重症护理护士对调查问卷中的每个条目对重症护理的重要性进行评分。基于这些结果,美国重症护理护士协会研究委员会制定了一份临床研究主题清单和一份非临床(背景)研究主题清单。每个清单包含25个主题。在第三阶段,在为期一天的研究重点共识会议上对主题进行了最终排名。使用李克特式量表和量级估计量表来确定每个清单上条目的优先排名。结果,为美国重症护理护士协会确定了临床和背景研究重点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验