Calnan M, Williams S
Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury.
Fam Pract. 1993 Jun;10(2):137-51. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.2.137.
The objectives of the study were to identify the level of general practitioner (GP) involvement in activities aimed at coronary heart disease prevention and to explain variations in involvement. These questions were explored through a postal survey of a random sample (n = 1696) of GPs in England of whom 64% completed questionnaires. Ninety-four per cent of GPs reported that they were involved in risk factor assessment in the consultation although these assessments most commonly involved blood pressure testing and identification of smoking. Ninety-one per cent of practices were reported by the GP to have a lifestyle risk assessment clinic where there was more evidence of systematic risk assessment. These clinics were usually run by a practice nurse as were lifestyle risk factor management clinics although GPs were more involved in hypertension and cholesterol clinics. Positive attitudes to prevention and training in health promotion were associated with higher GP involvement, and higher practice involvement was associated primarily with the number of practice nurses employed. The implication of these findings are discussed.
该研究的目的是确定全科医生(GP)参与冠心病预防活动的程度,并解释参与程度的差异。通过对英格兰全科医生的随机样本(n = 1696)进行邮政调查来探讨这些问题,其中64%的人完成了问卷。94%的全科医生报告称他们在诊疗过程中参与了风险因素评估,不过这些评估最常见的是血压检测和吸烟情况识别。91%的诊所被全科医生报告设有生活方式风险评估诊所,在那里有更多系统风险评估的证据。这些诊所通常由执业护士运营,生活方式风险因素管理诊所也是如此,尽管全科医生更多地参与高血压和胆固醇诊所。对预防的积极态度和健康促进方面的培训与全科医生更高的参与度相关,而更高的诊所参与度主要与所雇佣的执业护士数量有关。讨论了这些发现的意义。