Suppr超能文献

一项关于结肠切除术后疼痛、镇痛药物使用以及肺功能的初步研究,该研究比较了术前是否给予硬膜外吗啡推注的情况。

A pilot study of pain, analgesia use, and pulmonary function after colectomy with or without a preoperative bolus of epidural morphine.

作者信息

Simpson T, Wahl G, DeTraglia M, Speck E, Taylor D

机构信息

University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle 98195.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 1993 Jul-Aug;22(4):316-27.

PMID:8360066
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients who received a preoperative bolus of epidural morphine plus postoperative parenteral analgesia had less pain and better pulmonary function over the first 2 days after a colectomy than patients who received postoperative parenteral analgesia alone.

DESIGN

Repeated measures, quasi-experimental, random assignment.

SETTING

Northeastern general hospital.

SUBJECTS

Thirteen patients were randomized to receive parenteral with (n = 6) or without (n = 7) epidural analgesia.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Indicators of pain (intensity of pain and pain-related distress, intensity of words used to describe pain, intramuscular-equivalent amount of morphine administered, duration from start of surgery to first request for analgesia) and pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in one second FEV1], forced vital capacity [FVC], inspiratory capacity [IC], peripheral oxygen saturation [SaO2] values).

MEASUREMENT

Indicators of pain and pulmonary function were obtained the day before surgery, approximately 6 hours after surgery, and the first two mornings after surgery.

RESULTS

Six hours after surgery, patients in the epidural group had less pain (p = 0.0177) and related distress (p = 0.0303) and greater FVC (p = 0.0303) and FEV1 (p = 0.0025) than patients in the no-epidural group. On the first postoperative morning, patients in the epidural group had less distress related to pain (p = 0.0350) but similar respiratory rates and spirometry values. Inspiratory capacity was not statistically different but was always larger in the epidural group. Of patients who breathed room air, SaO2 was higher in the epidural group over the first two postoperative days (p = 0.0286 each occasion). Patients in the epidural group received their first on-demand analgesic an average of 30 hours after the start of surgery compared with 6 hours for patients in the no-epidural group (p = 0.0022). There were no significant differences in the total number of words used to describe the type of pain, and both groups described the pain with fewer words than expected on the first and second mornings after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Results should be confirmed through study of a larger sample with the hypothesis that pain relief, selected aspects of pulmonary function, and peripheral oxygenation may be superior for patients who receive a preoperative bolus of epidural analgesia for abdominal surgery.

摘要

目的

确定接受术前单次硬膜外注射吗啡加术后胃肠外镇痛的患者与仅接受术后胃肠外镇痛的患者相比,在结肠切除术后的前两天内是否疼痛较轻且肺功能更好。

设计

重复测量、准实验性、随机分组。

地点

东北综合医院。

研究对象

13例患者被随机分为接受(n = 6)或不接受(n = 7)硬膜外镇痛的胃肠外镇痛组。

观察指标

疼痛指标(疼痛强度和与疼痛相关的痛苦、描述疼痛所用词汇的强度、肌肉注射等效剂量的吗啡、从手术开始到首次要求镇痛的持续时间)和肺功能指标(一秒用力呼气量[FEV1]、用力肺活量[FVC]、吸气量[IC]、外周血氧饱和度[SaO2]值)。

测量方法

在手术前一天、手术后约6小时以及术后的头两个早晨获取疼痛和肺功能指标。

结果

术后6小时,硬膜外组患者的疼痛(p = 0.0177)和相关痛苦(p = 0.0303)较轻,FVC(p = 0.0303)和FEV1(p = 0.0025)高于非硬膜外组患者。在术后第一个早晨,硬膜外组患者与疼痛相关的痛苦较轻(p = 0.0350),但呼吸频率和肺量计值相似。吸气量无统计学差异,但硬膜外组始终较大。在呼吸室内空气的患者中,硬膜外组在术后前两天的SaO2较高(每次p = 0.0286)。硬膜外组患者在手术开始后平均30小时接受首次按需镇痛,而非硬膜外组患者为6小时(p = 0.0022)。描述疼痛类型所用词汇的总数无显著差异,两组在术后第一天和第二天早晨描述疼痛所用的词汇均比预期少。

结论

应通过对更大样本的研究来证实结果,假设接受术前单次硬膜外镇痛的腹部手术患者在疼痛缓解、选定的肺功能方面和外周氧合方面可能更优。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验