Suppr超能文献

氟斑牙的认知

Perceptions of dental fluorosis.

作者信息

Riordan P J

机构信息

Dental Services, Health Department of Western Australia, Como.

出版信息

J Dent Res. 1993 Sep;72(9):1268-74. doi: 10.1177/00220345930720090201.

Abstract

Mild dental fluorosis has long been accepted as a side-effect of water fluoridation and, more recently, has been recognized as a consequence of the use of other fluoride-based caries-preventive strategies. Traditionally, dental health professionals have not seen this as being of public health importance, but members of the public have not been asked their opinion. The purpose of the present study was to gather the opinions of lay groups concerning the appearance of the teeth of children with various degrees of fluorosis. Twenty-eight children, born in 1978, who had earlier participated in a study of fluorosis in Perth (Western Australia), allowed 110 observers to look at their upper central incisors under good viewing conditions. Fluorosis in these teeth ranged from TF score 0 (no fluorosis) to TF score 3. The observers were university students, parents, public servants, or dentists. They responded to statement items about the appearance of the teeth. The results, based on just over 3000 responses, showed that lay and dental observers could distinguish between different fluorosis levels. In response to a statement that the teeth appeared pleasing, a large majority agreed when the TF score was 0, but agreement declined as the TF score increased; when the TF score was 3, most people disagreed. Similarly, observers felt that the appearance would increasingly embarrass the child as the TF score increased. Observers, except the dentists, tended to feel that higher TF scores indicated neglect on the part of the child.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

轻度氟斑牙长期以来一直被认为是水氟化的副作用,最近,它也被视为使用其他基于氟化物的龋齿预防策略的结果。传统上,牙科保健专业人员并不认为这具有公共卫生重要性,但从未询问过公众的意见。本研究的目的是收集非专业群体对不同程度氟斑牙儿童牙齿外观的看法。28名1978年出生的儿童,他们早些时候参与了西澳大利亚珀斯的一项氟斑牙研究,让110名观察者在良好的观察条件下查看他们的上颌中切牙。这些牙齿的氟斑牙程度从TF评分0(无氟斑牙)到TF评分3不等。观察者包括大学生、家长、公务员或牙医。他们对关于牙齿外观的陈述项目做出回应。基于3000多个回复的结果表明,非专业和牙科观察者能够区分不同的氟斑牙水平。对于牙齿看起来令人愉悦的陈述,当TF评分为0时,绝大多数人表示同意,但随着TF评分的增加,同意的人数减少;当TF评分为3时,大多数人表示不同意。同样,观察者认为随着TF评分的增加,牙齿外观会让孩子越来越尴尬。除牙医外,观察者往往认为较高的TF评分表明孩子受到了忽视。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验