Suppr超能文献

[生存还是毁灭。流行病学、司法及心理学方面]

[To be born or not to be. Epidemiologic, judicial and psychological aspects].

作者信息

Dumoulin M, Blondel B, Lequien P

机构信息

Service de Médecine Néonatale, CHRU de Lille, Hôpital Calmette.

出版信息

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1993;22(4):385-92.

PMID:8360438
Abstract

The requisites for filling up birth certificates in France (> or = 180 days of pregnancy and vitality at the registration of birth) are different from the criteria recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO) (at least 500 g) for national statistics. The number of stillborn babies and neonatal deaths known from two different sources in the Nord-Pas de Calais Region in 1988-1989 have been compared ie: the vital statistics published by INSEE and the data of a survey carried out in hospitals according to the WHO criteria. Among the 808 known perinatal deaths in the survey, 305 (37.7%) were ignored or were not classified in the same categories by the registration services for vital statistics. 230 children including 29 born alive had not been registered and 75 children born alive had been registered as still born. The disparity in these definitions between INSEE and the WHO has serious consequences: the perinatal mortality measured by INSEE is underestimated by 28%, in comparison with mortality registered according to the WHO criteria. The 180 day threshold of viability reduces the social rights of employed women and makes it more difficult for them to have the money they spent on medical care refunded. Finally, as it is impossible to find a trace of these children who were not legally registered since they were under the threshold of viability, the mourning response of parents to perinatal deaths is all the more difficult. Current evolution in the threshold of viability observed in maternity units, makes it necessary to change the criteria which are applied for the legal registration of births.

摘要

在法国,填写出生证明的条件(怀孕180天及以上且出生登记时具有生命力)与世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐用于国家统计的标准(至少500克)不同。对1988 - 1989年诺尔 - 加莱海峡地区从两个不同来源得知的死产婴儿和新生儿死亡数量进行了比较,即:法国国家统计局公布的人口动态统计数据以及根据WHO标准在医院进行的一项调查的数据。在该调查中已知的808例围产期死亡中,有305例(37.7%)被人口动态统计登记部门忽略或未被归类到相同类别。230名儿童(包括29名出生时存活的)未进行登记,75名出生时存活的儿童被登记为死产。法国国家统计局与WHO在这些定义上的差异产生了严重后果:与根据WHO标准登记的死亡率相比,法国国家统计局测量的围产期死亡率被低估了28%。180天的存活门槛降低了职业女性的社会权利,使她们更难获得医疗费用的报销。最后,由于无法找到这些因未达到存活门槛而未进行合法登记的儿童的踪迹,父母对围产期死亡的哀悼反应变得更加困难。产科病房目前观察到的存活门槛的变化,使得有必要改变用于出生法律登记所适用的标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验