• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The struggle for the soul of health insurance.

作者信息

Stone D A

机构信息

Brandeis University.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Summer;18(2):287-317. doi: 10.1215/03616878-18-2-287.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-18-2-287
PMID:8360451
Abstract

The politics of American health insurance is a struggle over which vision of distributive justice should govern: the solidarity principle or the logic of actuarial fairness. Actuarial fairness is central to American private health insurance. It is both an antiredistributive ideology and a method of organizing mutual aid by fragmenting communities into ever-smaller, more homogeneous groups, leading ultimately to the destruction of mutual aid. This fragmentation is accomplished by fostering in people a sense of their differences and their responsibility for themselves, rather than their commonalities and interdependence. Actuarial fairness developed as a business strategy for gaining market share. Medical underwriting, which is far more extensive than commonly known, is the information technology used for implementing actuarial fairness. Despite significant changes in the political context of health insurance which are leading toward restraints on underwriting, the logic of actuarial fairness is so deeply embedded in the structure of competitive markets in insurance and so deeply consonant with social divisions in American society that eradicating it will take more than any current reform proposals contemplate.

摘要

相似文献

1
The struggle for the soul of health insurance.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Summer;18(2):287-317. doi: 10.1215/03616878-18-2-287.
2
Insurability and the HIV epidemic: ethical issues in underwriting.可保性与艾滋病流行:保险核保中的伦理问题
Milbank Q. 1990;68(4):497-525.
3
Genetics and the moral mission of health insurance.遗传学与健康保险的道德使命。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1992 Nov-Dec;22(6):12-7.
4
Unmanaged care: towards moral fairness in health care coverage.非管理式医疗:迈向医疗覆盖中的道德公平。
Indiana Law J. 2003 Summer;78(2):659-721.
5
Excluding more, covering less. The health insurance industry in the U.S.
Health PAC Bull. 1992 Spring;22(1):6-13.
6
The practice and ethics of risk-rated health insurance.
JAMA. 1992 May 13;267(18):2503-8.
7
Ethics, genetic prediction, and heart disease.
Am J Cardiol. 1993 Sep 30;72(10):80D-84D. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90016-6.
8
Insurance reform in a voluntary system: implications for the sick, the well, and universal health care. American College of Physicians.
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Aug 1;125(3):242-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-3-199608010-00015.
9
Punishing the lemon: the ethics of actuarial fairness.惩罚柠檬:精算公平的伦理。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Dec;9(12):887-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.09.012.
10
Individual insurance: health insurers try to tap potential market growth.个人保险:健康保险公司试图挖掘潜在的市场增长机会。
Res Brief. 2009 Nov(14):1-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Corporate Logic in Clinical Care: The Case of Diabetes Management.企业逻辑在临床护理中的体现:以糖尿病管理为例。
Med Anthropol Q. 2019 Dec;33(4):463-482. doi: 10.1111/maq.12533. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
2
Privacy in the age of medical big data.医疗大数据时代的隐私问题。
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):37-43. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0272-7. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
3
Varying Opinions on Who Deserves Collectively Financed Health Care Services: A Discrete Choice Experiment on Allocation Preferences of the General Public.关于谁应获得集体资助的医疗保健服务的不同观点:一项关于公众分配偏好的离散选择实验
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958017751981. doi: 10.1177/0046958017751981.
4
Views on the ethical struggle for universal, high quality, affordable health care and its relevance for gerontology.关于为实现全民、高质量、可负担的医疗保健而进行的伦理斗争及其与老年医学的相关性的观点。
Exp Gerontol. 2017 Jan;87(Pt B):182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
Gold and silver health plans: accommodating demand heterogeneity in managed competition.金银健康计划:在管理竞争中满足需求异质性。
J Health Econ. 2011 Sep;30(5):1011-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.018. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
6
Genetic 'risk carriers' and lifestyle 'risk takers'. Which risks deserve our legal protection in insurance?基因“风险携带者”与生活方式“冒险者”。在保险领域,哪些风险值得我们给予法律保护?
Health Care Anal. 2007 Sep;15(3):179-93. doi: 10.1007/s10728-006-0041-5. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
7
Health services research as a source of legislative analysis and input: the role of the California Health Benefits Review Program.作为立法分析和投入来源的卫生服务研究:加利福尼亚州健康福利审查项目的作用
Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun;41(3 Pt 2):1124-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00523.x.
8
Guidelines as rationing tools: a qualitative analysis of psychosocial patient selection criteria for cardiac procedures.作为配给工具的指南:心脏手术患者心理社会选择标准的定性分析
CMAJ. 2001 Mar 6;164(5):634-40.
9
Why not private health insurance? 1. Insurance made easy.为什么不选择私人医疗保险呢?1. 保险轻松搞定。
CMAJ. 1999 Sep 7;161(5):539-42.
10
Risk equalization, competition, and choice: a preliminary assessment of the 1993 German health reforms.风险均等化、竞争与选择:对1993年德国医疗改革的初步评估
Soz Praventivmed. 1996;41(4):212-23. doi: 10.1007/BF01299481.