Underwood P A
CSIRO, Division of Biomolecular Engineering, Sydney Laboratory, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
J Immunol Methods. 1993 Aug 26;164(1):119-30. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(93)90282-c.
Current methods of estimation of antibody affinity constants using ELISA assume homogeneous binding of antibody to the solid phase, despite many reports in the literature that this is not true. I have derived theoretical antibody binding curves for solid phase antigen assuming homogeneous antibody binding. I have compared these curves with a set of experimental binding curves of monoclonal antibodies to the serum protein fibronectin. The results conclusively show that while some monoclonal antibodies behave as predicted by theory, others show departures from homogeneous binding which can be explained by various surface effects. I have discussed how these surface effects can cause errors in estimates of either liquid phase or solid phase affinities using the ELISA, and have demonstrated the limitations of methods of affinity ranking.
目前使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)来估算抗体亲和常数的方法假定抗体与固相的结合是均匀的,尽管文献中有许多报道表明并非如此。我推导了假设抗体均匀结合的固相抗原的理论抗体结合曲线。我将这些曲线与一组单克隆抗体与血清蛋白纤连蛋白的实验结合曲线进行了比较。结果确凿地表明,虽然一些单克隆抗体的行为如理论预测的那样,但其他单克隆抗体表现出与均匀结合的偏差,这可以用各种表面效应来解释。我讨论了这些表面效应如何在使用ELISA估算液相或固相亲和力时导致误差,并证明了亲和力排序方法的局限性。