Shannon G M, Negrey J N, Siliquini J J
Arch Ophthalmol. 1977 Jan;95(1):141-2. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1977.04450010141014.
A series of ten patients had canalicular intubation with Teflon and Silastic tubing. Our experience has shown that Silastic tubing appears to be more pliable, has good capillary action, and causes less irritation within the canalicular system than polyethylene or Teflon tubing. Five patients had very good results, three patients were improved, and there were two failures. We believe that this technique is useful in selected cases where there is an obstructed canaliculus near its junction with the sac. There should be only minimal scarring in the medial canthal area for the greatest chance of success with this method.
对10例患者进行了硅胶管和聚四氟乙烯管泪小管插管术。我们的经验表明,硅胶管似乎更柔韧,具有良好的毛细作用,与聚乙烯或聚四氟乙烯管相比,在泪小管系统内引起的刺激更少。5例患者效果非常好,3例患者有所改善,2例失败。我们认为,该技术在泪小管与泪囊交界处附近有阻塞的特定病例中是有用的。内眦区域的瘢痕应尽量小,以使该方法获得最大的成功机会。