Park S I, Saxe J C, Weesner R E
Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Ohio.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Sep;88(9):1391-4.
Occult blood-screening methods which do not require stool manipulation have been devised in an attempt to improve patient compliance with fecal occult blood testing. We performed a randomized, prospective study comparing patient compliance with the Coloscreen Self Test, a fecal occult blood detection method which does not require stool manipulation, and standard guaiac-impregnated cards in a VA clinic and a university-based private practice to determine whether the Coloscreen Self-Test would improve patient compliance with fecal occult blood testing. Overall, there was no significant difference in compliance between the two tests, with a compliance of 71% (105/147) for the guaiac cards and 60% (88/136) for the Coloscreen Self-Test (p = 0.49). However, multiple logistic regression showed that, when using the Coloscreen Self-Test, patients at the VA clinic had significantly reduced compliance. Only 46% (23/50) returned the Coloscreen Self-Test compared with 84% (42/50) who returned the guaiac cards (p < 0.05). We conclude that the Coloscreen Self-Test does not improve patient compliance with fecal occult blood testing, and may reduce compliance in some sectors of the population.
为了提高患者对粪便潜血检测的依从性,已经设计出了无需处理粪便的潜血筛查方法。我们进行了一项随机前瞻性研究,在一家退伍军人事务部诊所和一家大学附属私人诊所比较患者对Coloscreen自检(一种无需处理粪便的粪便潜血检测方法)和标准愈创木脂浸渍卡片的依从性,以确定Coloscreen自检是否能提高患者对粪便潜血检测的依从性。总体而言,两种检测方法的依从性没有显著差异,愈创木脂卡片的依从性为71%(105/147),Coloscreen自检的依从性为60%(88/136)(p = 0.49)。然而,多元逻辑回归显示,在使用Coloscreen自检时,退伍军人事务部诊所的患者依从性显著降低。只有46%(23/50)的患者返还了Coloscreen自检结果,而返还愈创木脂卡片的患者为84%(42/50)(p < 0.05)。我们得出结论,Coloscreen自检并不能提高患者对粪便潜血检测的依从性,并且可能会降低某些人群的依从性。