Suppr超能文献

一项早产预防项目的多中心随机对照试验。早产预防协作组。

Multicenter randomized, controlled trial of a preterm birth prevention program. Collaborative Group on Preterm Birth Prevention.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;169(2 Pt 1):352-66. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90087-y.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The results of a randomized, controlled trial of a preterm birth prevention program at five centers with primarily low-income populations are presented.

STUDY DESIGN

Pregnant women at high risk for preterm labor were independently randomized into intervention and control groups at each of five centers (2395 women). Specially trained staff instructed women in the intervention group to recognize early signs of preterm labor and to notify the staff should any sign of preterm labor occur, and women came in weekly for pelvic examinations after 20 to 24 weeks' gestation. Because the intervention had very different and contrary effects on preterm birth rates across these sites, the analysis focused on patient risks and on measures of the process of care as possible explanations for the differences in outcomes.

RESULTS

The observed spontaneous preterm birth rates, when averaged for all sites, were not lower in the intervention group than in the control groups (16.1% vs 15.4% for < 37 completed weeks' gestation, 11.9% vs 10.9% for < 36 completed weeks). There was substantial heterogeneity of program effects between centers (p < 0.01 for homogeneity test statistic). The differences in intervention effects between centers were explainable only in part by patient risk characteristics (p < 0.10 for homogeneity test statistic). The only intermediate measure of the process of care that tended to differentiate among sites with positive intervention effects was the rate of hospital admission for preterm labor. Sites with elevated admission rates in the intervention group versus the control group tended to have negative intervention effects on outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Because the preterm birth prevention program did not show a reliable benefit and because the reasons for varied outcomes are not understood, the use of the program cannot be recommended for predominantly low-income populations.

摘要

目的

呈现一项在五个主要为低收入人群的中心开展的早产预防项目的随机对照试验结果。

研究设计

五个中心的早产高危孕妇(共2395名妇女)被独立随机分为干预组和对照组。经过专门培训的工作人员指导干预组妇女识别早产的早期迹象,若出现任何早产迹象应通知工作人员,且妇女在妊娠20至24周后每周前来进行盆腔检查。由于该干预措施在这些地点对早产率产生了非常不同且相反的影响,分析聚焦于患者风险以及护理过程的各项指标,以此作为结果差异的可能解释。

结果

所有地点的平均观察到的自然早产率,干预组并不低于对照组(妊娠满37周前为16.1%对15.4%,妊娠满36周前为11.9%对10.9%)。各中心之间项目效果存在显著异质性(同质性检验统计量p<0.01)。中心之间干预效果的差异仅部分可由患者风险特征解释(同质性检验统计量p<0.10)。唯一一项在有积极干预效果的不同地点之间有区分倾向的护理过程中间指标是早产住院率。干预组与对照组相比住院率升高的地点往往对结果有负面干预效果。

结论

由于早产预防项目未显示出可靠益处,且由于结果差异的原因不明,不建议在主要为低收入人群中使用该项目。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验