Schauffler H H
School of Public Health, University of California 94720.
Am J Public Health. 1993 Sep;83(9):1226-30. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.9.1226.
Public health policy promotes the use of risk-rating health insurance and payment for smoking cessation as economic incentives to encourage smoking cessation. This study was undertaken to learn more about the adoption of these policies in large corporations.
A random sample survey of 280 private California corporations with more than 500 employees was undertaken to document the prevalence of policies integrating smoking control into employee benefit designs.
Only 8.6% of large corporations had ever considered risk-rating health insurance premiums using smoking status and only 2.15% had implemented a risk-rating policy. Nearly 20% of the companies offered health insurance plans that covered smoking cessation services. Subsidization or payment for smoking cessation outside health insurance was provided by over 37% of the companies surveyed, and 87% had adopted formal work-site smoking policies.
Benefit policies that provide financial support to smokers to participate in smoking cessation services are much more prevalent and are viewed more positively by the benefits managers in large corporations than are policies to risk-rate health insurance premiums on the basis of smoking.
公共卫生政策提倡使用风险评级的健康保险,并为戒烟提供支付,以此作为鼓励戒烟的经济激励措施。本研究旨在进一步了解这些政策在大公司中的采用情况。
对加利福尼亚州280家拥有500多名员工的私营公司进行随机抽样调查,以记录将吸烟控制纳入员工福利设计的政策的普及情况。
只有8.6%的大公司曾考虑根据吸烟状况对健康保险费进行风险评级,只有2.15%的公司实施了风险评级政策。近20%的公司提供涵盖戒烟服务的健康保险计划。超过37%的受调查公司为健康保险之外的戒烟提供补贴或支付费用,87%的公司采用了正式的工作场所吸烟政策。
与基于吸烟情况对健康保险费进行风险评级的政策相比,为吸烟者提供经济支持以参与戒烟服务的福利政策更为普遍,并且在大公司的福利经理中得到更积极的看待。