Suppr超能文献

可充电式起搏器系统的评估

Evaluation of a rechargeable pacemaker system.

作者信息

Stertzer S H, DePasquale N P, Cohn L J, Bruno M S

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1978 Apr;1(2):186-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1978.tb03463.x.

Abstract

A rechargeable-demand nickel-cadmium pulse generator for permanent transvenous cardiac pacing was evaluated in 66 patients. During a cumulative follow-up period of 2,333 patient months (194.4 patient years), failure of the pacing circuit occurred in 3 patients at 21, 25, and 27 months, respectively. Nine patients had difficulty accepting the recharging concept and, in 3 of these patients, it became necessary to replace the rechargeable generator with a conventional energy source. The overall failure rate of approximately 3% per year (including the 3 patients in whom it was necessary to remove the generator because of failure to recharge properly), coupled with the inconvenience of recharging, limits the usefulness of the rechargeable system compared to the newer lithium-powered generator.

摘要

对一种用于永久性经静脉心脏起搏的可充电按需镍镉脉冲发生器在66例患者中进行了评估。在累计2333个患者月(194.4患者年)的随访期内,起搏电路分别在21、25和27个月时出现故障,累及3例患者。9例患者难以接受充电概念,其中3例患者有必要将可充电发生器更换为传统能源。每年约3%的总体故障率(包括3例因充电不当而必须移除发生器的患者),再加上充电带来的不便,与更新的锂供电发生器相比,限制了可充电系统的实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验