Suppr超能文献

等速运动时肌内压力和肌电图作为力量指标

Intramuscular pressure and electromyography as indexes of force during isokinetic exercise.

作者信息

Aratow M, Ballard R E, Crenshaw A G, Styf J, Watenpaugh D E, Kahan N J, Hargens A R

机构信息

Life Science Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035-1000.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Jun;74(6):2634-40. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.6.2634.

Abstract

A direct method for measuring force production of specific muscles during dynamic exercise is presently unavailable. Previous studies indicate that both intramuscular pressure (IMP) and electromyography (EMG) correlate linearly with muscle contraction force during isometric exercise. The objective of this study was to compare IMP and EMG as linear assessors of muscle contraction force during dynamic exercise. IMP and surface EMG activity were recorded during concentric and eccentric isokinetic plantarflexion and dorsiflexion of the ankle joint from the tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL) muscles of nine male volunteers (28-54 yr). Ankle torque was measured using a dynamometer, and IMP was measured via catheterization. IMP exhibited better linear correlation than EMG with ankle joint torque during concentric contractions of the SOL (IMP R2 = 0.97, EMG R2 = 0.81) and the TA (IMP R2 = 0.97, EMG R2 = 0.90), as well as during eccentric contractions (SOL: IMP R2 = 0.91, EMG R2 = 0.51; TA: IMP R2 = 0.94, EMG R2 = 0.73). IMP provides a better index of muscle contraction force than EMG during concentric and eccentric exercise through the entire range of torque. IMP reflects intrinsic mechanical properties of individual muscles, such as length-tension relationships, which EMG is unable to assess.

摘要

目前尚无直接测量动态运动期间特定肌肉力量产生的方法。先前的研究表明,在等长运动期间,肌内压(IMP)和肌电图(EMG)均与肌肉收缩力呈线性相关。本研究的目的是比较IMP和EMG作为动态运动期间肌肉收缩力的线性评估指标。在9名男性志愿者(28 - 54岁)的胫骨前肌(TA)和比目鱼肌(SOL)进行踝关节向心和离心等速跖屈及背屈运动时,记录IMP和表面EMG活动。使用测力计测量踝关节扭矩,并通过导管插入术测量IMP。在SOL的向心收缩(IMP R2 = 0.97,EMG R2 = 0.81)和TA的向心收缩(IMP R2 = 0.97,EMG R2 = 0.90)期间,以及在离心收缩期间(SOL:IMP R2 = 0.91,EMG R2 = 0.51;TA:IMP R2 = 0.94,EMG R2 = 0.73),IMP与踝关节扭矩的线性相关性均优于EMG。在整个扭矩范围内,向心和离心运动期间,IMP比EMG能更好地反映肌肉收缩力。IMP反映了单个肌肉的内在力学特性,如长度 - 张力关系,而EMG无法评估这些特性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验