Vela N P, Caruso J A
Department of Chemistry, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221-0172.
J Chromatogr. 1993 Jul 9;641(2):337-45. doi: 10.1016/0021-9673(93)80150-7.
Organotin compounds are separated by capillary supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and a comparison of the detection by flame ionization (FID) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is presented. Resolution, detection limits, linear dynamic range and reproducibility are the parameters compared between SFC-FID and SFC-ICP-MS, for the detection of tri- and tetraorganotin compounds. The resolution obtained in the SFC-FID system is not always observed in SFC-ICP-MS. Degradation in resolution is due to fluctuations in transfer line temperature. Baseline resolution for the organotins considered is achieved in both systems by using a longer column. Detection limits (DLs) are calculated as 3 sigma/S, where sigma is the standard deviation of the blank signal and S is the slope of the calibration curve. Detection limits of 10.3, 12.5, 12.0 and 9.0 pg are obtained for tetrabutyltin, tributyltin chloride, triphenyltin chloride and tetraphenyltin, respectively, using SFC-FID. An improvement in detection limits of one order of magnitude is achieved by SFC-ICP-MS for the same organotins (0.26, 0.80, 0.57 and 0.20 pg, respectively). The relative standard deviations using SFC-FID for five 50-nl injections, containing 0.5 ng Sn, ranged from 3.2 to 6.4%. Using SFC-ICP-MS, five replicate injections of 0.05 ng Sn give R.S.D.s from 1.3 to 3.4%.
有机锡化合物通过毛细管超临界流体色谱法(SFC)进行分离,并对火焰离子化检测(FID)和电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)的检测结果进行了比较。分辨率、检测限、线性动态范围和重现性是比较SFC-FID和SFC-ICP-MS检测三有机锡和四有机锡化合物时的参数。SFC-FID系统中获得的分辨率在SFC-ICP-MS中并非总能观察到。分辨率下降是由于传输线温度波动所致。通过使用更长的色谱柱,两种系统都实现了所考虑的有机锡化合物的基线分辨率。检测限(DLs)计算为3σ/S,其中σ是空白信号的标准偏差,S是校准曲线的斜率。使用SFC-FID时,四丁基锡、三丁基氯化锡、三苯基氯化锡和四苯基锡的检测限分别为10.3、12.5、12.0和9.0 pg。对于相同的有机锡化合物,SFC-ICP-MS使检测限提高了一个数量级(分别为0.26、0.80、0.57和0.20 pg)。使用SFC-FID对五次50 nl含0.5 ng Sn的进样进行检测,相对标准偏差范围为3.2%至6.4%。使用SFC-ICP-MS对0.05 ng Sn进行五次重复进样,相对标准偏差为1.3%至3.4%。