Nine New Jersey hospitals charge Blue Cross with antitrust. Beth Israel Hospital et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc.
作者信息
Hudson T
出版信息
Hosp Health Netw. 1993 Sep 20;67(18):62.
PMID:8369840
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Nine New Jersey hospitals charge Blue Cross with antitrust. Beth Israel Hospital et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc.
Hosp Health Netw. 1993 Sep 20;67(18):62.
2
Judge Posner's RFP: antitrust law and managed care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Nov-Dec;16(6):44-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.6.44.
3
Ore. upstart takes on rival.
Mod Healthc. 2002 Feb 11;32(6):18-9, 21.
4
Most Favored Nation clauses require close scrutiny.
Ga Hosp Today. 1995 Nov;39(11):3.
5
Ore. hospital appeals dismissal of lawsuit.
Mod Healthc. 1992 Sep 28;22(39):63.
6
States may become battleground in push for collective bargaining.
Manag Care. 2002 Jun;11(6):10-2.
7
8
Cost questions. How antitrust, uniformity and exercise play their roles.
Mod Healthc. 2010 Oct 25;40(43):20.
9
Federal investigation welcome, Independence Blue Cross says.
Mod Healthc. 1994 Jan 3;24(1):18.
10
Comment on Kartell v. Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.: an antitrust analysis of Blue Shield's reimbursement schemes.
Am J Law Med. 1986;11(4):465-500.
Zotero 插件