• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Judge Posner's RFP: antitrust law and managed care.

作者信息

Sage W M

机构信息

Columbia University, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Nov-Dec;16(6):44-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.6.44.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.16.6.44
PMID:9444808
Abstract

The emergence of a competitive market in health care portends an increasingly important role for antitrust law. Managed care is even more difficult than fee-for-service practice to analyze in the quantitative, economic terms required by modern principles of antitrust law. This paper examines a recent court decision authored by a prominent judge and antitrust scholar: Blue Cross and Blue Shield United of Wisconsin v. Marshfield Clinic. The purpose of the paper is not to describe the law as it is or as it should be, but to illustrate the assumptions and gaps in understanding that can occur when courts are asked to evaluate this complex and rapidly changing industry without the benefit of sound empirical research.

摘要

相似文献

1
Judge Posner's RFP: antitrust law and managed care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Nov-Dec;16(6):44-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.6.44.
2
Ore. upstart takes on rival.俄勒冈州的新贵挑战竞争对手。
Mod Healthc. 2002 Feb 11;32(6):18-9, 21.
3
The Marshfield Clinic case: the sound of a broken record.马什菲尔德诊所事件:老生常谈。
Ann Health Law. 1996(5):1-31.
4
Ore. hospital appeals dismissal of lawsuit.俄勒冈州的医院对诉讼被驳回提出上诉。
Mod Healthc. 1992 Sep 28;22(39):63.
5
Nine New Jersey hospitals charge Blue Cross with antitrust. Beth Israel Hospital et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc.新泽西州的九家医院指控蓝十字存在反垄断行为。贝斯以色列医院等诉新泽西州蓝十字蓝盾公司。
Hosp Health Netw. 1993 Sep 20;67(18):62.
6
Comment on Kartell v. Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.: an antitrust analysis of Blue Shield's reimbursement schemes.
Am J Law Med. 1986;11(4):465-500.
7
Cost containment in the health care field and the antitrust laws.医疗保健领域的成本控制与反垄断法。
Am J Law Med. 1982 Winter;7(4):425-35.
8
Most Favored Nation clauses require close scrutiny.最惠国条款需仔细审查。
Ga Hosp Today. 1995 Nov;39(11):3.
9
Is this group an illegal doctor monopoly?这个团体是非法的医生垄断组织吗?
Med Econ. 1994 Sep 26;71(18):64-6, 69-70, 72 passim.
10
Antitrust implications of health planning: National Gerimedical Hospital and Gerontology Center v. Blue Cross of Kansas City.医疗规划的反垄断影响:国家老年医学医院及老年医学中心诉堪萨斯城蓝十字公司案
Am J Law Med. 1982 Fall;8(3):321-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Studying the effects of health plan competition: are available data resources up to the task?研究健康计划竞争的影响:现有数据资源能否胜任这项任务?
Health Serv Res. 2001 Apr;36(1 Pt 2):253-75.