• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对情感障碍和人格障碍患者的精神科日间治疗随机试验。

A randomized trial of psychiatric day treatment for patients with affective and personality disorders.

作者信息

Piper W E, Rosie J S, Azim H F, Joyce A S

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Aug;44(8):757-63. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.8.757.

DOI:10.1176/ps.44.8.757
PMID:8375836
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The outcome of a day treatment program for psychiatric outpatients with affective and personality disorders was evaluated. The program was dynamically oriented, intensive, group focused, and time limited (18 weeks).

METHODS

The prospective trial used a randomized treatment-versus-control (delayed-treatment) design to examine 17 outcome variables covering five areas: interpersonal functioning, symptomatology, self-esteem, life satisfaction, and defensive functioning. Those variables, plus individualized treatment objectives, were monitored before and after the treatment and control periods and at follow-up an average of eight months later.

RESULTS

Treated patients showed significantly better outcome than control patients for seven of the 17 outcome variables: social dysfunction, family dysfunction, interpersonal behavior, mood level, life satisfaction, self-esteem, and severity of disturbance associated with individual goals of treatment as rated by an independent assessor. The findings could not be accounted for by diagnosis or use of medication. Benefits were maintained over the follow-up period. The average treatment-versus-control effect size for all 17 variables was .71.

CONCLUSIONS

The study supports the efficacy of an intensive day treatment program for patients who manifest significant difficulties associated with affective and personality disorders.

摘要

目的

评估一项针对患有情感障碍和人格障碍的精神科门诊患者的日间治疗项目的效果。该项目以动态为导向,强度大,以小组为重点,且时间有限(18周)。

方法

这项前瞻性试验采用随机治疗与对照(延迟治疗)设计,以检验涵盖五个领域的17个结果变量:人际功能、症状学、自尊、生活满意度和防御功能。在治疗期和对照期前后以及平均八个月后的随访中,对这些变量以及个体化治疗目标进行监测。

结果

在17个结果变量中的7个方面,接受治疗的患者比对照患者表现出明显更好的结果:社会功能障碍、家庭功能障碍、人际行为、情绪水平、生活满意度、自尊以及由独立评估者评定的与个体治疗目标相关的障碍严重程度。这些发现无法用诊断或药物使用来解释。在随访期间,疗效得以维持。所有17个变量的平均治疗与对照效应大小为0.71。

结论

该研究支持了一项强化日间治疗项目对那些表现出与情感障碍和人格障碍相关重大困难的患者的疗效。

相似文献

1
A randomized trial of psychiatric day treatment for patients with affective and personality disorders.一项针对情感障碍和人格障碍患者的精神科日间治疗随机试验。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Aug;44(8):757-63. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.8.757.
2
Personality disorder moderates outcome in short- and long-term group analytic psychotherapy: A randomized clinical trial.人格障碍对短期和长期团体分析心理治疗的结果有调节作用:一项随机临床试验。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2015 Jun;54(2):129-46. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12065. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
3
Patient characteristics and success in day treatment.日间治疗中的患者特征与治疗成效
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994 Jul;182(7):381-6. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199407000-00003.
4
Psychological mindedness, work, and outcome in day treatment.
Int J Group Psychother. 1994 Jul;44(3):291-311. doi: 10.1080/00207284.1994.11490755.
5
Is reflective functioning associated with clinical symptoms and long-term course in patients with personality disorders?反思功能与人格障碍患者的临床症状及长期病程是否相关?
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;64:46-58. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
Who benefits the most from psychiatric day hospitals? A comparison of three clinical groups.谁从精神科日间医院中获益最多?三个临床组别的比较。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2010 Mar;16(2):93-102. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000369970.87779.ca.
7
Step-down versus outpatient psychotherapeutic treatment for personality disorders: 6-year follow-up of the Ullevål personality project.住院式与门诊式心理治疗人格障碍的对比:乌勒瓦尔人格项目 6 年随访结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Apr 23;14:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-119.
8
What the patient wants: Addressing patients' treatment targets in an integrative group psychotherapy programme.患者的诉求:在综合团体心理治疗方案中满足患者的治疗目标。
Psychol Psychother. 2019 Mar;92(1):20-38. doi: 10.1111/papt.12174. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
9
Adaptation of interpersonal psychotherapy to borderline personality disorder: a comparison of combined therapy and single pharmacotherapy.人际心理治疗对边缘型人格障碍的适应:联合治疗与单一药物治疗的比较。
Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;55(2):74-81. doi: 10.1177/070674371005500203.
10
Randomized, controlled trial of the effectiveness of short-term dynamic psychotherapy and cognitive therapy for cluster C personality disorders.短期动态心理治疗与认知疗法对C类人格障碍有效性的随机对照试验
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 May;161(5):810-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.5.810.

引用本文的文献

1
Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review.关于为有复杂情感需求的人群提供社区治疗的证据现状:范围综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 5;22(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04171-z.
2
Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder.反社会人格障碍的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 3;9(9):CD007668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007668.pub3.
3
Mentalization-based treatment or psychodynamic treatment programmes for patients with borderline personality disorder - the impact of clinical severity.
基于心理化的治疗或精神动力学治疗方案对边缘型人格障碍患者的影响 - 临床严重程度的作用。
Psychol Psychother. 2019 Mar;92(1):91-111. doi: 10.1111/papt.12179. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
4
Suicidal Individuals and Mental Health Treatment: A Novel Approach to Engagement.自杀个体与心理健康治疗:一种新型的参与方式。
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Jul;52(5):527-33. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9980-3. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
5
Short-term intensive psychodynamic group therapy versus cognitive-behavioral group therapy in day treatment of anxiety disorders and comorbid depressive or personality disorders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.短期强化心理动力团体治疗与认知行为团体治疗在焦虑症及共病抑郁或人格障碍日间治疗中的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jul 29;16:319. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0827-6.
6
Psychological interventions for obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.强迫型人格障碍的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(5). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008518.
7
Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders.日间医院治疗与急性精神障碍住院治疗的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD004026. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004026.pub2.
8
Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder.反社会型人格障碍的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16(6):CD007668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007668.pub2.
9
[Day hospital treatment in psychiatry].[精神病学中的日间医院治疗]
Nervenarzt. 2010 Mar;81(3):355-63; quiz 364-5. doi: 10.1007/s00115-009-2898-7.
10
Day hospital versus outpatient care for people with schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者的日间医院护理与门诊护理对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD003240. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003240.pub2.