Suppr超能文献

人际心理治疗对边缘型人格障碍的适应:联合治疗与单一药物治疗的比较。

Adaptation of interpersonal psychotherapy to borderline personality disorder: a comparison of combined therapy and single pharmacotherapy.

机构信息

Service for Personality Disorders, Unit of Psychiatry 1, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 11, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;55(2):74-81. doi: 10.1177/070674371005500203.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Combined treatment with interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) and antidepressants (ADs) has been found more effective than single pharmacotherapy in patients with major depression and concomitant borderline personality disorder (BPD). The aim of our study is to investigate whether combined treatment with a modified version of IPT is still superior to ADs when treating patients with a single diagnosis of BPD.

METHOD

Fifty-five consecutive outpatients with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, diagnosis of BPD were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to 2 treatment arms for 32 weeks: fluoxetine 20 to 40 mg per day plus clinical management; and fluoxetine 20 to 40 mg per day plus IPT adapted to BPD (IPT-BPD). Eleven patients (20%) discontinued treatment owing to noncompliance. Forty-four patients completed the treatment period. They were assessed at baseline, and at week 16 and 32 with: a semi-structured interview for demographic and clinical variables; Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-S); Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS); Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS); Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS); BPD Severity Index (BPD-SI); and a questionnaire for quality of life (Satisfaction Profile [SAT-P]). A univariate general linear model was performed with 2 factors: duration and type of treatment. P values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Remission rates did not differ significantly between subgroups. Duration, but not type of treatment, had a significant effect on CGI-S, HDRS, SOFAS, and total BPD-SI score changes. Combined therapy was more effective on the HARS; the items: interpersonal relationships, affective instability, and impulsivity of BPD-SI; and the factors: psychological functioning and social functioning of SAT-P.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined therapy with adapted IPT was superior to fluoxetine alone in BPD patients, concerning a few core symptoms of the disorder, anxiety, and quality of life.

摘要

目的

人际心理治疗(IPT)联合抗抑郁药(ADs)治疗与单纯药物治疗相比,对伴有边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的重性抑郁障碍患者更有效。本研究旨在探讨当治疗对象为单一 BPD 诊断患者时,改良版 IPT 联合治疗是否仍优于 ADs。

方法

连续纳入 55 例符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 4 版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)BPD 诊断的门诊患者。他们被随机分配至 2 个治疗组,接受为期 32 周的治疗:氟西汀 20-40mg/天联合临床管理;氟西汀 20-40mg/天联合适应 BPD 的 IPT(IPT-BPD)。11 例(20%)患者因不依从而中断治疗。44 例患者完成了治疗期。他们在基线时、第 16 周和第 32 周接受了以下评估:人口统计学和临床变量的半结构式访谈;临床总体印象量表(CGI-S);汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS);汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HARS);社会和职业功能评定量表(SOFAS);BPD 严重程度指数(BPD-SI);生活质量问卷(满意度概况问卷[SAT-P])。采用 2 个因素的单变量一般线性模型:治疗持续时间和治疗类型。P 值<0.05 被认为有统计学意义。

结果

缓解率在亚组之间无显著差异。治疗持续时间而非治疗类型对 CGI-S、HDRS、SOFAS 和 BPD-SI 总分的变化有显著影响。联合治疗在 HARS、BPD-SI 的人际关系、情感不稳定和冲动项目以及 SAT-P 的心理功能和社会功能因子方面更有效。

结论

适应 BPD 的 IPT 联合治疗在 BPD 患者中优于单独使用氟西汀,涉及该障碍的一些核心症状、焦虑和生活质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验