Landolt M
Helv Chir Acta. 1993 Jun;59(5-6):965-9.
The predicted increase in the ageing population and the associated increase in fractures of the proximal femur have turned the search for improved treatment methods into a permanent task. If the DHS and the Gamma nail are compared, the Gamma nail has a more advantageous lever arm and has proved more reliable in both static and dynamic testing. Prospective studies have shown no significant differences in operation time, loss of blood or duration of hospitalisation. The Gamma nail enables earlier mobilisation; the mortality rate is the same for both procedures. In reference to Gamma nailing it is worth noting the occurrence of intra and postoperative femoral fractures in 1-8% of cases.
预计老年人口的增加以及随之而来的股骨近端骨折的增多,使得寻找更好的治疗方法成为一项长期任务。如果将动力髋螺钉(DHS)和伽马钉进行比较,伽马钉具有更有利的杠杆臂,并且在静态和动态测试中都已证明更可靠。前瞻性研究表明,在手术时间、失血量或住院时间方面没有显著差异。伽马钉能够使患者更早活动;两种手术的死亡率相同。关于伽马钉固定术,值得注意的是,有1%-8%的病例会发生术中及术后股骨骨折。