• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医疗产科护理的有效性。跨文化与环境视角。

The effectiveness of family practice maternity care. A cross-cultural and environmental view.

作者信息

Klein M

机构信息

Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Prim Care. 1993 Sep;20(3):523-36.

PMID:8378449
Abstract

All 17 studies of family practice maternity care have shown reduced procedure rates for comparable populations of women cared for by family physicians versus those cared for by obstetricians, while maternal and infant outcomes are as good or better for the patients of family practitioners. System issues are the most predictive of positive outcomes such that in settings in which continuity and intimacy is high and women of no defined risk are cared for by providers specifically oriented to such care, outcomes are the best. In contrast, when such women are cared for by providers specifically oriented for high-risk or tertiary settings, their care becomes medicalized and they become sick. Staff attitudes, rules, and organizational structures are more predictive of outcome than professional labels. Family physicians in all settings can do more to lower their intervention rates and "humanize" care.

摘要

所有17项关于家庭医生产科护理的研究均表明,与由产科医生护理的可比女性群体相比,由家庭医生护理的女性群体的手术率降低,而家庭医生护理的患者的母婴结局同样良好或更佳。系统问题对积极结局的预测性最强,即在连续性和亲密性较高且无明确风险的女性由专门从事此类护理的提供者护理的环境中,结局最佳。相比之下,当此类女性由专门针对高风险或三级护理环境的提供者护理时,她们的护理会变得医学化,她们也会生病。员工态度、规则和组织结构对结局的预测性比专业标签更强。所有环境中的家庭医生都可以在降低干预率和使护理“人性化”方面做得更多。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of family practice maternity care. A cross-cultural and environmental view.家庭医疗产科护理的有效性。跨文化与环境视角。
Prim Care. 1993 Sep;20(3):523-36.
2
A comparison of pregnancy care delivered by family physicians versus obstetricians in Lebanon.黎巴嫩家庭医生与产科医生提供的孕期护理比较。
Fam Med. 1993 Jul-Aug;25(7):465-70.
3
Should general practitioners have any role in maternity care in the future?未来全科医生在产科护理中应发挥作用吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Apr;46(405):243-7.
4
Is maternity care different in family practice? A pilot matched pair study.家庭医疗中的孕产护理有差异吗?一项配对试点研究。
J Fam Pract. 1987 Sep;25(3):237-42.
5
Obstetric outcomes in a rural family practice: an eight-year experience.
J Fam Pract. 1988 Oct;27(4):377-84.
6
Obstetrics in family practice: a personal and political perspective.家庭医疗中的产科:个人及政治视角
J Fam Pract. 1976 Aug;3(4):391-6.
7
Withdrawal from maternity care. A comparison of family physicians in Ontario, Canada, and the United States.退出孕产妇保健服务。加拿大安大略省和美国的家庭医生比较。
J Fam Pract. 1990 Mar;30(3):336-41.
8
Physician perceptions regarding competence of obstetrical providers and attitudes about other issues in obstetrical care.医生对产科医护人员能力的看法以及对产科护理中其他问题的态度。
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2001 Dec;94(12):554-60.
9
Maternity care by family physicians vs obstetricians.家庭医生与产科医生提供的孕产妇护理。
J Fam Pract. 1995 Apr;40(4):401-2.
10
Perceived characteristics of successful family practice residency maternity care training programs.成功的家庭医学住院医师妇产科护理培训项目的可感知特征。
Fam Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;29(10):709-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Family physicians in the maternity care workforce: factors influencing declining trends.产妇保健劳动力中的家庭医生:影响下降趋势的因素。
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Nov;17(9):1576-81. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1159-8.
2
Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization.产妇保健中的风险调整:间接标准化的应用。
Int J Womens Health. 2010 Aug 20;2:255-62. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S9494.
3
Satisfaction with obstetric care. Patient survey in a family practice shared-call group.对产科护理的满意度。家庭医疗共享值班组中的患者调查。
Can Fam Physician. 1999 Mar;45:651-7.
4
The midwife dossier: cooperation or competition?助产士档案:合作还是竞争?
CMAJ. 1994 Mar 1;150(5):657-61.