Sharma P L
Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1977 Jan;15(1):27-30.
A comparative study of the intensity and duration of action of intravenously administered single doses of atenolol and practolol on the resting and exercise-evoked increase in heart rate and rate-pressure product was carried out in six normal human subjects. On a weight to weight basis, atenolol was 8 times more potent than practolol. There were only marginal differences in the intensity and duration of action of the two drugs. Atenolol, like practolol, was well-tolerated and no side effects were observed. If found safe on longterm use, atenolol may be a suitable alternative to practolol. The daily administration of atenolol in two divided doses should suffice for therapeutic purposes.
对6名正常受试者进行了一项比较研究,观察静脉注射单剂量阿替洛尔和心得宁对静息及运动诱发的心率增加和心率-血压乘积的作用强度和持续时间。按重量比计算,阿替洛尔的效力比心得宁强8倍。两种药物的作用强度和持续时间仅有微小差异。阿替洛尔与心得宁一样,耐受性良好,未观察到副作用。如果长期使用安全,阿替洛尔可能是心得宁的合适替代品。将阿替洛尔每日分两次给药应足以达到治疗目的。