Haislett J, Hughes R B, Atkinson G, Williams C L
Department of Nursing Science, College of Nursing, Clemson University, SC 29634-1703.
J Nurs Educ. 1993 Feb;32(2):64-70. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19930201-07.
This article explores student learning styles as an important variable in four-year baccalaureate nursing programs. Student learning styles were assessed by Kolb's Learning Style Inventory-1985 (LSI-1985), which identifies the accommodator, diverger, assimilator, and converger learning styles. The authors examined the relationship between learning style and academic performance as measured by grade-point ratio (GPR) and studied behaviors and attitudes as measured by Brown and Holtzman's (1964) Survey of Study Habits and Attitudes. Analysis indicated that this sample (N = 100) included mainly assimilators and divergers, making reflective observation the most common mode of learning. Compared to the accommodator/converger group, the assimilator/diverger group earned a significantly higher GPR, significantly better scores on the study habits variable of Work Methods (WM), and moderately better scores on the study attitude variable of Educational Acceptance (EA). Accommodators were identified as the most at-risk learning style group, and specific interventions were suggested to assist accommodators in adapting to the academic rigors of a nursing curriculum.
本文探讨了学生学习风格这一四年制护理学学士学位项目中的重要变量。通过科尔布1985年学习风格量表(LSI - 1985)对学生学习风格进行评估,该量表确定了顺应者、发散者、聚合者和同化者这几种学习风格。作者研究了学习风格与以平均绩点(GPR)衡量的学业成绩之间的关系,并研究了以布朗和霍尔兹曼(1964年)的学习习惯与态度调查问卷衡量的行为和态度。分析表明,该样本(N = 100)主要包括同化者和发散者,使得反思性观察成为最常见的学习模式。与顺应者/聚合者组相比,同化者/发散者组的GPR显著更高,在学习习惯变量“工作方法”(WM)上的得分显著更高,在学习态度变量“教育接受度”(EA)上的得分略高。顺应者被确定为风险最高的学习风格群体,并提出了具体干预措施以帮助顺应者适应护理课程的学业要求。