Mohler K M, Torrance D S, Smith C A, Goodwin R G, Stremler K E, Fung V P, Madani H, Widmer M B
Department of Immunology, Immunex Corporation, Seattle, WA 98101.
J Immunol. 1993 Aug 1;151(3):1548-61.
Two forms (monomeric or dimeric) of the extracellular, ligand-binding portion of the human p80 cell-surface receptor for TNF were used to antagonize TNF activity in vitro and in vivo. The dimeric sTNFR:Fc molecule was a more potent inhibitor of TNF than the monomeric sTNFR (50 to 1000x), as assessed in vitro by inhibition of TNF binding or bioactivity and in vivo by protection of mice from an otherwise lethal injection of LPS. Surprisingly, the dimeric sTNFR:Fc construct demonstrated a beneficial effect even when administered 3 h after a lethal LPS injection (i.e., after serum TNF levels had peaked and receded). To study the mechanism by which the soluble TNFR functions in vivo, serum TNF levels were examined in mice given LPS in the presence or absence of soluble receptor. Administration of a mortality-reducing dose of sTNFR:Fc ablated the rise in serum TNF bioactivity that normally occurs in response to LPS. However, TNF bioactivity was revealed in these "TNF-negative" serum samples when the L929 bioassay was modified by inclusion of a mAb that blocks the binding of murine TNF to the human soluble TNFReceptor. These results indicate that the absence of direct cytolytic activity in the L929 assay was caused by neutralization of TNF, rather than to an absence of TNF in the serum. Moreover, administration of either monomeric sTNFR or low doses of dimeric sTNFR:Fc actually resulted in increased serum TNF levels compared to mice given LPS but no soluble receptor. However, these "agonistic" doses of soluble receptor did not lead to increased mortality when an LD60 dose of LPS was given. Thus, dimeric sTNFR are effective inhibitors of TNF and under some circumstances function simultaneously as both TNF "carriers" and antagonists of TNF biologic activity.
人类肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)p80细胞表面受体的细胞外配体结合部分的两种形式(单体或二聚体)被用于在体外和体内拮抗TNF活性。通过抑制TNF结合或生物活性在体外评估,以及通过保护小鼠免受致死剂量的脂多糖(LPS)注射在体内评估,二聚体sTNFR:Fc分子比单体sTNFR是更有效的TNF抑制剂(50至1000倍)。令人惊讶的是,即使在致死性LPS注射3小时后(即血清TNF水平达到峰值并下降后)给予二聚体sTNFR:Fc构建体仍显示出有益效果。为了研究可溶性TNFR在体内发挥作用的机制,在给予或不给予可溶性受体的情况下,检测了给予LPS的小鼠的血清TNF水平。给予降低死亡率剂量的sTNFR:Fc消除了通常因LPS而发生的血清TNF生物活性的升高。然而,当通过加入阻断鼠TNF与人可溶性TNF受体结合的单克隆抗体来改进L929生物测定法时,这些“TNF阴性”血清样品中显示出TNF生物活性。这些结果表明,L929测定法中缺乏直接细胞溶解活性是由TNF的中和引起的,而不是血清中不存在TNF。此外,与给予LPS但未给予可溶性受体的小鼠相比,给予单体sTNFR或低剂量的二聚体sTNFR:Fc实际上导致血清TNF水平升高。然而,当给予LD60剂量的LPS时,这些“激动剂”剂量的可溶性受体并未导致死亡率增加。因此,二聚体sTNFR是有效的TNF抑制剂,并且在某些情况下同时作为TNF的“载体”和TNF生物活性的拮抗剂发挥作用。