Morimoto Y, Wettstein M, Häussinger D
Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Freiburg, Germany.
Biochem J. 1993 Jul 15;293 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2):573-81. doi: 10.1042/bj2930573.
Metabolic and haemodynamic effects of adenosine were studied in antegrade and retrograde rat liver perfusions with influent nucleoside concentrations either below (i.e. 20 microM) or exceeding (i.e. 200-300 microM) the single-pass clearance capacity of the liver. Adenosine (20 microM) increased in antegrade perfusions the perfusion pressure and markedly stimulated prostaglandin D2, thromboxane B2 and glucose output, whereas in retrograde perfusions no pressure and eicosanoid response occurred and glucose output was stimulated only slightly. The perfusion-direction-dependent differences in the glucose and pressure response to adenosine (20 microM) were fully abolished in presence of ibuprofen (50 microM). When the adenosine concentration in influent was raised to 200-300 microM, i.e. to a concentration exceeding single-pass clearance of the nucleoside, the adenosine-induced prostaglandin D2 release was about 10-fold higher in retrograde perfusions than in antegrade perfusions. On the other hand, both adenosine (20-300 microM)-induced cyclic AMP (cAMP) and K+ release from the liver were not affected by the direction of perfusion, and maximal effects on cAMP release were observed at influent adenosine concentrations of 100 microM. The basal rate (adenosine absent) of prostaglandin D2 and thromboxane B2 release was about 10-fold higher in retrograde than in antegrade perfusion experiments, whereas the basal cAMP release from the liver was not affected by the direction of perfusion. Maximal adenosine-stimulated glucose output was significantly higher in antegrade than in retrograde perfusions at all adenosine concentrations tested (range 10-300 microM). Ibuprofen abolished this difference, indicating that eicosanoids liberated under the influence of adenosine contribute to the glycogenolytic response in antegrade, but not in retrograde, perfusion. Desensitization occurred following repetitive adenosine infusion; this was more pronounced for adenosine-induced prostaglandin release than for cAMP or K+ efflux. The data suggest the following. (i) Both cAMP and eicosanoids are involved in the stimulation of glycogenolysis by adenosine. (ii) Eicosanoids are probably liberated under the influence of extracellular adenosine from a portal pre-sinusoidal compartment and accordingly stimulate glycogenolysis only in antegrade perfusions. Thus signals derived from portal vein structures can modulate hepatocellular function. (iii) Contractile elements are probably located also inside the liver acinus. (iv) Eicosanoids released into the hepatic vein reflect less than 10% of hepatic eicosanoid formation, because of marked clearance by perivenous hepatocytes.
在大鼠肝脏顺行和逆行灌注实验中,研究了腺苷的代谢和血流动力学效应,实验中流入的核苷浓度分别低于(即20微摩尔)或超过(即200 - 300微摩尔)肝脏的单次通过清除能力。腺苷(20微摩尔)在顺行灌注中增加了灌注压力,并显著刺激了前列腺素D2、血栓素B2和葡萄糖输出,而在逆行灌注中未出现压力和类花生酸反应,仅轻微刺激了葡萄糖输出。在存在布洛芬(50微摩尔)的情况下,腺苷(20微摩尔)引起的葡萄糖和压力反应中灌注方向依赖性差异完全消除。当流入的腺苷浓度提高到200 - 300微摩尔,即超过核苷的单次通过清除浓度时,腺苷诱导的前列腺素D2释放逆行灌注比顺行灌注高约10倍。另一方面,腺苷(20 - 300微摩尔)诱导的肝脏环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)和钾离子释放不受灌注方向影响,在流入腺苷浓度为100微摩尔时观察到对cAMP释放的最大效应。逆行灌注实验中前列腺素D2和血栓素B2释放的基础速率(无腺苷)比顺行灌注高约10倍,而肝脏基础cAMP释放不受灌注方向影响。在所有测试的腺苷浓度(范围10 - 300微摩尔)下,腺苷刺激的最大葡萄糖输出顺行灌注显著高于逆行灌注。布洛芬消除了这种差异,表明腺苷作用下释放的类花生酸促成了顺行灌注而非逆行灌注中的糖原分解反应。重复输注腺苷后发生脱敏;这在腺苷诱导的前列腺素释放方面比cAMP或钾离子外流更明显。数据表明如下:(i)cAMP和类花生酸均参与腺苷对糖原分解的刺激。(ii)类花生酸可能在细胞外腺苷影响下从门静脉窦前区室释放,因此仅在顺行灌注中刺激糖原分解。因此,来自门静脉结构的信号可调节肝细胞功能。(iii)收缩元件可能也位于肝腺泡内部。(iv)由于肝静脉周围肝细胞的显著清除作用,释放到肝静脉中的类花生酸反映的肝类花生酸形成量不到10%。