Fehr L A, Heintzelman M E
J Psychol. 1977 Jan;95(1st Half):63-6. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1977.9915861.
The Allport-Vernon-Lindzey Study of Values and the Brown Modification of the Thouless Test of Religious Orthodoxy were administered to 120 male and female students in introductory psychology. Measures of anxiety, self-esteem, authoritarianism, and humanitarianism were also administered to the Ss in an effort to determine whether the two measures of religiosity would yield different personality and attitude profiles of the "religious" individual. A significant positive correlation was found between authoritarianism and the Thouless Test and between humanitarianism and the Study of Values religious measure. All other correlations involving the two measures of religiosity were found to be nonsignificant. These findings lend support to the notion that using two divergent measures of religiosity does result in the formation of different profiles of the "religious" individual.
对120名选修心理学入门课程的男女学生进行了奥尔波特-弗农-林德赛价值观研究以及对桑利斯宗教正统性测试的布朗修订版测试。还对这些受试者进行了焦虑、自尊、权威主义和人道主义的测量，以确定这两种宗教信仰测量方法是否会得出“宗教”个体不同的性格和态度特征。研究发现，权威主义与桑利斯测试之间以及人道主义与价值观研究宗教信仰测量方法之间存在显著的正相关。发现涉及这两种宗教信仰测量方法的所有其他相关性均不显著。这些发现支持了这样一种观点，即使用两种不同的宗教信仰测量方法确实会形成“宗教”个体的不同特征。
